British League
Moderators: Tigerbeat, Rizzo, Tigers Press Office, Tigers Webmaster
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 938
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 8:15 pm
- Location: Ashby de la zouch
British League
After the success of the Welsh teams against the English teams this weekend (3-1) albeit against weaker opposition what do you think about a british league ?
Having two divisions with the celtic clubs all starting off in division 2, then having promotion and relegation with 3 up and 3 down.
Would the English rugby fan be interested ?
Having two divisions with the celtic clubs all starting off in division 2, then having promotion and relegation with 3 up and 3 down.
Would the English rugby fan be interested ?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 301
- Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 10:41 pm
- Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
-
- Super User
- Posts: 4454
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 8:50 am
- Location: Tonbridge
Sounds interesting in theory.
A few questions though?
How many teams would be in the two divisions and how would it be decided who would go in each division? How many Division 1 teams would be promoted to that League initially, and in future?
There may well be less games for the teams as would occur with the Conference System mooted before on this forum. Do you envisage friendlies being played say during the internationals to make up for lost income?
One way round the issue of lost income would be to still play 22 games. With a draw each year to see who the extra games are played against, on top of the usual home and away draw.
A few questions though?
How many teams would be in the two divisions and how would it be decided who would go in each division? How many Division 1 teams would be promoted to that League initially, and in future?
There may well be less games for the teams as would occur with the Conference System mooted before on this forum. Do you envisage friendlies being played say during the internationals to make up for lost income?
One way round the issue of lost income would be to still play 22 games. With a draw each year to see who the extra games are played against, on top of the usual home and away draw.
-
- Super User
- Posts: 4454
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 8:50 am
- Location: Tonbridge
I see your issues, Hans. Although if the RFU are to introduce central contracts then I feel that they must compensate clubs for the loss of their key players. As loss of key players to central contracts would mean lost revenue un less clubs could then bring in imports.
I know that would be very difficult to achieve, perhaps impossible, as somebody said when I talked about parachute money from the RFU for less games played when player injuries were talked about recently. However, if not the clubs would kick up a lot of fuss and there would be a re-enactment of recent strife between the PRL and the RFU. The RFU will have to adapt on this as must the PRL on certain other issues, too.
I know that would be very difficult to achieve, perhaps impossible, as somebody said when I talked about parachute money from the RFU for less games played when player injuries were talked about recently. However, if not the clubs would kick up a lot of fuss and there would be a re-enactment of recent strife between the PRL and the RFU. The RFU will have to adapt on this as must the PRL on certain other issues, too.
-
- Super User
- Posts: 7106
- Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 8:40 pm
- Location: NW Leics
Hi OiL
The English rugby fan, in principle, would be supportive (I am assuming that the EDF would be scrapped).
Not so sure about the owners; no club will sign up to a '3 down' season. A two conference structure (2 x eight) would therefore be necessary.
The Welsh fans would be very positive, but the Irish and Scots furious !
I don't think revenue loss would be much of an issue with the conference structure, you could see a 22 game season if intra-conference you played 'home and away' and inter-conference 'home or away'.
The English rugby fan, in principle, would be supportive (I am assuming that the EDF would be scrapped).
Not so sure about the owners; no club will sign up to a '3 down' season. A two conference structure (2 x eight) would therefore be necessary.
The Welsh fans would be very positive, but the Irish and Scots furious !
I don't think revenue loss would be much of an issue with the conference structure, you could see a 22 game season if intra-conference you played 'home and away' and inter-conference 'home or away'.
-
- Super User
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 5:30 pm
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 938
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 8:15 pm
- Location: Ashby de la zouch
The reason I said that was because the English clubs would be up in arms about if they had to drop into a 2nd division, so if like Dailywaffle says have 2 up 2 down the cream would soon rise to the top.mightymouse wrote:bit odd having the likes of Munster and Leinster in div 2 - whilst Worcester and Quins started in Div 1 ??
Surely the top half of each division into the Div one etc
Borders I beleive are on the brink of going under so that would leave 22 teams, you could have 2 divisions of 11 teams with one team having a free weekend every matchday which would help with player burn out !
And scrap cup matches just have the European cup.
-
- Super User
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 5:30 pm
sounds quite a good scheme to me especially the scrapping the cup bit
the only downside I see is in the second year when lets say for arguments sake Munster and Leinster go up and Worcs and Quins come down - the bulk of the celtic teams would now be playing in a weaker not a stronger league - It would benefit the top English teams more as their league gets strengthened but not the celts.
the only downside I see is in the second year when lets say for arguments sake Munster and Leinster go up and Worcs and Quins come down - the bulk of the celtic teams would now be playing in a weaker not a stronger league - It would benefit the top English teams more as their league gets strengthened but not the celts.
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 938
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 8:15 pm
- Location: Ashby de la zouch
Agree with that but say within 4 years you would have the strongest teams in division 1. I know Id rather be playing the likes of Quins rather than Borders even if it was in Divison 2.mightymouse wrote:sounds quite a good scheme to me especially the scrapping the cup bit
the only downside I see is in the second year when lets say for arguments sake Munster and Leinster go up and Worcs and Quins come down - the bulk of the celtic teams would now be playing in a weaker not a stronger league - It would benefit the top English teams more as their league gets strengthened but not the celts.
All pie in the sky was just wondering if you would like to be playing the likes of Munster, Llanelli, Ulster, Ospreys on a weekly basis rather than the Worcester's and Quins of this world.
-
- Super User
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 5:30 pm
-
- Silver Member
- Posts: 723
- Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: Banbury
If top half of Magners league went into div 1 and bottom into div 2, Munster and Leinster (being 9th and 7th respectively) would find themselves in div 2 I agree with what you're saying thoughmightymouse wrote:bit odd having the likes of Munster and Leinster in div 2 - whilst Worcester and Quins started in Div 1 ??
Surely the top half of each division into the Div one etc
-
- Super User
- Posts: 7106
- Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 8:40 pm
- Location: NW Leics
OiL
I think you may have misunderstood my 2 x conference post (sorry if it made no sense !).
With 2 x conferences of equal strength, you avoid both relegation (very thorny) and the vaguely farcical sight of Ospreys et al putting 100 points on Div 2 teams. The 2 x conference champions play off for the championship. The alternative of Div 1 and Div 2 avoids playoffs, but would bring a couple of years of chaos and those 'relegation' arguments.
The numbers do stack up:
Include the Welsh regions only; 2 x eight (with inter conference play to raise revenue).
Or, add Irish provinces; 2 x ten.
Possibly add 2 x Scottish Districts; 2 x eleven (as you suggest).
I think we would welcome the Welsh with open arms. The same could not be said of the Scots, sorry, but there is no real Anglo-Scot club tradition and they are not box office.
The Irish certainly are box office, but some might prefer to keep matches against Munster/Leinster/Ulster 'special', i.e. HEC only. Add to this the IRFU stance on retaining players and I wonder if this could only ever really be an Anglo-Welsh project.
I think you may have misunderstood my 2 x conference post (sorry if it made no sense !).
With 2 x conferences of equal strength, you avoid both relegation (very thorny) and the vaguely farcical sight of Ospreys et al putting 100 points on Div 2 teams. The 2 x conference champions play off for the championship. The alternative of Div 1 and Div 2 avoids playoffs, but would bring a couple of years of chaos and those 'relegation' arguments.
The numbers do stack up:
Include the Welsh regions only; 2 x eight (with inter conference play to raise revenue).
Or, add Irish provinces; 2 x ten.
Possibly add 2 x Scottish Districts; 2 x eleven (as you suggest).
I think we would welcome the Welsh with open arms. The same could not be said of the Scots, sorry, but there is no real Anglo-Scot club tradition and they are not box office.
The Irish certainly are box office, but some might prefer to keep matches against Munster/Leinster/Ulster 'special', i.e. HEC only. Add to this the IRFU stance on retaining players and I wonder if this could only ever really be an Anglo-Welsh project.
-
- Top Cat
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 11:47 pm
- Location: Co.Antrim
I think we would welcome the Welsh with open arms. The same could not be said of the Scots, sorry, but there is no real Anglo-Scot club tradition and they are not box office.
The Irish certainly are box office, but some might prefer to keep matches against Munster/Leinster/Ulster 'special', i.e. HEC only. Add to this the IRFU stance on retaining players and I wonder if this could only ever really be an Anglo-Welsh project.[/quote]
Ulster, Munster and Leinster would never agree to being dumped into the second division. A slightly understrength Ulster side minus players like Trimble ,Neil Best, Simon Best, Tommy Bowe and Matt McCullough annihilated a full strenght Ospreys side 43 - 7 just last week. get real. If you were moving teams on the basis of last years performance, Ulster , Leinster and Munster finished one , two and three in theat order. I would rather see Ulster playing Leicester or Wasps than the Ospreys or the Dragons but we have to make the best of what we each have.
The Irish certainly are box office, but some might prefer to keep matches against Munster/Leinster/Ulster 'special', i.e. HEC only. Add to this the IRFU stance on retaining players and I wonder if this could only ever really be an Anglo-Welsh project.[/quote]
Ulster, Munster and Leinster would never agree to being dumped into the second division. A slightly understrength Ulster side minus players like Trimble ,Neil Best, Simon Best, Tommy Bowe and Matt McCullough annihilated a full strenght Ospreys side 43 - 7 just last week. get real. If you were moving teams on the basis of last years performance, Ulster , Leinster and Munster finished one , two and three in theat order. I would rather see Ulster playing Leicester or Wasps than the Ospreys or the Dragons but we have to make the best of what we each have.
Ulsterman
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 938
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 8:15 pm
- Location: Ashby de la zouch