Undoubtedly unknowns,so can't be explained by Science? Thanks for proving my pointCardiff Tig wrote: ↑Tue Oct 19, 2021 8:51 amThis is actually just incorrect - your arguments don't prove anything. There are undoubtedly unknowns surrounding the first emergence of "life", and it will likely never be answered due to the timescales involved and current scientific/technology levels as they are today.Scott1 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 18, 2021 10:30 pmTheyre still debatable but law of biogenics? Life must come from life. And what about law of probability? You number 10 cards 1 to 10 and give them a good shuffle and there's a one in 3,326,800 chance that they would fall 1-10. When you use a 100 cards it's 1 in 10 followed by 158 zeros chance it would fall 1-100. Without a living God to create life, the laws of probability and complexity prove beyond doubt that life could never come into existence at all.Cardiff Tig wrote: ↑Mon Oct 18, 2021 10:06 pm Always found the laws of thermodynamics to be pretty reliable myself...
And I'm not sure what any of this has to do with a rugby team in Devon using symbolism and profiting off the back of a group of people that have been historically - and still are to this day - oppressed and exploited by others.
I really need to stop getting involved in these threads...
Rugby tonight
Moderators: Tigerbeat, Rizzo, Tigers Press Office, Tigers Webmaster
Re: Rugby tonight
"Rugby isn't a contact sport,ballroom dancing is a contact sport. Rugby is a collision sport" Heyneke Meyer
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 2:07 pm
- Location: The bagging area (unexpectedly)
Re: Rugby tonight
There is a difference between can't and has not yet for example science has not yet found the origin of life on earth, science can't explain the refereeing decisions of Ian "Total Control" Tempest...Scott1 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 19, 2021 12:17 pmUndoubtedly unknowns,so can't be explained by Science? Thanks for proving my pointCardiff Tig wrote: ↑Tue Oct 19, 2021 8:51 amThis is actually just incorrect - your arguments don't prove anything. There are undoubtedly unknowns surrounding the first emergence of "life", and it will likely never be answered due to the timescales involved and current scientific/technology levels as they are today.Scott1 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 18, 2021 10:30 pm
Theyre still debatable but law of biogenics? Life must come from life. And what about law of probability? You number 10 cards 1 to 10 and give them a good shuffle and there's a one in 3,326,800 chance that they would fall 1-10. When you use a 100 cards it's 1 in 10 followed by 158 zeros chance it would fall 1-100. Without a living God to create life, the laws of probability and complexity prove beyond doubt that life could never come into existence at all.
And I'm not sure what any of this has to do with a rugby team in Devon using symbolism and profiting off the back of a group of people that have been historically - and still are to this day - oppressed and exploited by others.
I really need to stop getting involved in these threads...
No, not that one!
Remember, whatever you do to the smallest of the backs you do to his prop, and you can't avoid the rucks and mauls forever...
I know you don't like it when I boo him but how else will he know he's wrong?
non possumus capere
Remember, whatever you do to the smallest of the backs you do to his prop, and you can't avoid the rucks and mauls forever...
I know you don't like it when I boo him but how else will he know he's wrong?
non possumus capere
Re: Rugby tonight
Science will never be able to do thatCrofty wrote: ↑Sat Oct 23, 2021 10:29 amThere is a difference between can't and has not yet for example science has not yet found the origin of life on earth, science can't explain the refereeing decisions of Ian "Total Control" Tempest...Scott1 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 19, 2021 12:17 pmUndoubtedly unknowns,so can't be explained by Science? Thanks for proving my pointCardiff Tig wrote: ↑Tue Oct 19, 2021 8:51 am
This is actually just incorrect - your arguments don't prove anything. There are undoubtedly unknowns surrounding the first emergence of "life", and it will likely never be answered due to the timescales involved and current scientific/technology levels as they are today.
And I'm not sure what any of this has to do with a rugby team in Devon using symbolism and profiting off the back of a group of people that have been historically - and still are to this day - oppressed and exploited by others.
I really need to stop getting involved in these threads...
"Rugby isn't a contact sport,ballroom dancing is a contact sport. Rugby is a collision sport" Heyneke Meyer