What they were in the past was better than anyone else, it was all relevant to the level of the opposition.Tiger_in_Birmingham wrote:Pietersen at the beginning of the season was worth his weight in gold.biffer wrote:I think one of the key problems has been that our model of bringing players in has generally been to bring in someone who fits into one of two categories - someone who we feel is underrated or under the radar and we feel we can get them playing better than expected, or a player who is past their prime and looking for a payday. The latter category is the main failing and has resulted in us repeatedly spending a whack of money and getting nothing for it - see Pietersen, JdV, Kronfeld, Thorn as examples of a lot of cash for not a lot of time on the pitch. Toomua is a departure from that, and it's genuine bad luck that he's been injured. Getting players in their prime who can deliver 20 games a season is a must for the highest paid guys in the squad.
Kronfeld gave everything for the shirt - it was the combination of him and Back that made us the success we were in the early 2000s - everyone else was moving from a traiditon 6 & 7 to two 6.5s whereas Tigers played with two 7s and the opponents were never allowed the ball for very long
The game has moved on and so have the opposition.
Leicester are at a professional level but are not professional enough in approach, still they spend up to the cap which has and possibly always will be enough to maintain a certain level just as long as not too many below attain that ability.
The ones that have attained that ability have matched and overtaken already.
We are pinning our hopes on some magical style of rugby though that to be quite honest I've never ever seen played before at the top level and certainly not where the equality of a salary cap exists, I reckon I've got more chance of seeing Elvis riding a unicorn!