I don't think abolishment is technically incorrect. Given that 'establishment' is fine for the antonym, it's weird that abolishment has fallen out of use (notwithstanding the fact that they could have wildly different etymologies but I doubt it).DCat wrote:Message from the Pedants Society - shouldn't it be "abolition"? What sort of a word is "abolishment"?
FRU statement
Moderators: Tigerbeat, Rizzo, Tigers Press Office, Tigers Webmaster
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 5:53 pm
- Location: London
Re: FRU statement
Re: FRU statement
Well my Chambers's Twentieth Century Dictionary of Reprint 1929 states that Abolishment is a rarely used word and Abolition - the act of abolishing is preferable.Skin_and_Muscle wrote:I don't think abolishment is technically incorrect. Given that 'establishment' is fine for the antonym, it's weird that abolishment has fallen out of use (notwithstanding the fact that they could have wildly different etymologies but I doubt it).DCat wrote:Message from the Pedants Society - shouldn't it be "abolition"? What sort of a word is "abolishment"?
However this may be in the age of Nobby, Noddy :- Quote One whose head nods from weakness, a stupid fellow; a sea-fowl -- easily taken; a four wheeled carriage with the door at the back; (possibly red with yellow mudguards).
Long live the FRU in the ABC, hopefully a Noddy free zone.
Re: FRU statement
To get back to more serious matters I note that both Ayerza and Mulipola have also scored tries. This is becoming a worrying trend
Re: FRU statement
Establishment is clearly a noun. Abolishment therefore (were it a real word) would be a place where things get abolished. Obviously therefore an abolishment is a euphemism for either the RFU HQ or the Palace of Westminster, these being the two places were things are abolished. I.e. England as a tier 1 Rugby team in the case of the former and England as a tier 1 country in the case of the latter. Happy to help.
Nowadays referees decide matches, players by how much.
Re: FRU statement
Agreed but do not forget Harry Thacker No.16 scoring in Paris too.drc_007 wrote:To get back to more serious matters I note that both Ayerza and Mulipola have also scored tries. This is becoming a worrying trend
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 5:53 pm
- Location: London
Re: FRU statement
Ah, but it works as a verb, too. An/the establishment - noun. The establishment of - verb.G.K wrote:Establishment is clearly a noun. Abolishment therefore (were it a real word) would be a place where things get abolished. Obviously therefore an abolishment is a euphemism for either the RFU HQ or the Palace of Westminster, these being the two places were things are abolished. I.e. England as a tier 1 Rugby team in the case of the former and England as a tier 1 country in the case of the latter. Happy to help.
E.g. regarding, the archaic use of abolishment as a euphemism (or dysphemism?) or the RFU: The Abolishment (RFU) excels in the abolishment of [insert suggestion here].
Re: FRU statement
I could but you wouldn't like itSkin_and_Muscle wrote:Ah, but it works as a verb, too. An/the establishment - noun. The establishment of - verb.G.K wrote:Establishment is clearly a noun. Abolishment therefore (were it a real word) would be a place where things get abolished. Obviously therefore an abolishment is a euphemism for either the RFU HQ or the Palace of Westminster, these being the two places were things are abolished. I.e. England as a tier 1 Rugby team in the case of the former and England as a tier 1 country in the case of the latter. Happy to help.
E.g. regarding, the archaic use of abolishment as a euphemism (or dysphemism?) or the RFU: The Abolishment (RFU) excels in the abolishment of [insert suggestion here].
Life can be unpredictable, so eat your pudding first!
Re: FRU statement
Ah yes. Harry Thacker. The sub 13 stone, athletic, nimble front rower. Should excommunication be considered?wormus wrote:Agreed but do not forget Harry Thacker No.16 scoring in Paris too.drc_007 wrote:To get back to more serious matters I note that both Ayerza and Mulipola have also scored tries. This is becoming a worrying trend
Re: FRU statement
Yes you are correct of course and the answer is [the hopes of all England Rugby supporters].Skin_and_Muscle wrote:Ah, but it works as a verb, too. An/the establishment - noun. The establishment of - verb.G.K wrote:Establishment is clearly a noun. Abolishment therefore (were it a real word) would be a place where things get abolished. Obviously therefore an abolishment is a euphemism for either the RFU HQ or the Palace of Westminster, these being the two places were things are abolished. I.e. England as a tier 1 Rugby team in the case of the former and England as a tier 1 country in the case of the latter. Happy to help.
E.g. regarding, the archaic use of abolishment as a euphemism (or dysphemism?) or the RFU: The Abolishment (RFU) excels in the abolishment of [insert suggestion here].
Nowadays referees decide matches, players by how much.
-
- Super User
- Posts: 5033
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:19 pm
- Location: Thurnby Lodge
Re: FRU statement
isn't he excused and he was just pushing in a maul then tripped as he scored, showing the relevant lack of overall skill?Iain wrote:Ah yes. Harry Thacker. The sub 13 stone, athletic, nimble front rower. Should excommunication be considered?wormus wrote:Agreed but do not forget Harry Thacker No.16 scoring in Paris too.drc_007 wrote:To get back to more serious matters I note that both Ayerza and Mulipola have also scored tries. This is becoming a worrying trend
Re: FRU statement
I know the FRU shouldn't be expected to score tries, but members are expected to turn up!
Where were they on Saturday?
Where were they on Saturday?
Valhalla I am coming!
-
- Super User
- Posts: 2316
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 2:27 pm
- Location: South Lincolnshire
Re: FRU statement
First choices, head injury, back spasm and with England. I know, excuses, excusesfleabane wrote:I know the FRU shouldn't be expected to score tries, but members are expected to turn up!
Where were they on Saturday?
Re: FRU statement
*** After last weekends game against Wales Dan Cole was able to show his skill in keeping the ball above the ground with the help of his arm to prevent the score.fleabane wrote:Coles description of his antics makes me think he is a fully justified member of the FRU, and that there should be no sanctions against him for his actions.
However tonight's match in Paris he showed no such skills and fell on the line thereby causing a front row score. This offence must be reported to the FRU Front Row Union within 24 hours and the necessary citing made and possible suspension.
The Front Row Union need to meet on Sunday and arrange a hearing.
-
- Super User
- Posts: 5033
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:19 pm
- Location: Thurnby Lodge
Re: FRU statement
it was against the French, therefore no sanctions needed as its not possible to break any laws playing the frenchwormus wrote:*** After last weekends game against Wales Dan Cole was able to show his skill in keeping the ball above the ground with the help of his arm to prevent the score.fleabane wrote:Coles description of his antics makes me think he is a fully justified member of the FRU, and that there should be no sanctions against him for his actions.
However tonight's match in Paris he showed no such skills and fell on the line thereby causing a front row score. This offence must be reported to the FRU Front Row Union within 24 hours and the necessary citing made and possible suspension.
The Front Row Union need to meet on Sunday and arrange a hearing.
Re: FRU statement
Dan Cole's disrespect for the Front Row Union must be subject to a High Court ruling, going from 3 tries in 141 games to him scoring tries against Bath , France and today in Australia. It is against all the laws a quick ruling should be made to detain him in Sydney for 4 weeks and then appear before the FRU in the ABC Bar.Jimmy Skitz wrote:it was against the French, therefore no sanctions needed as its not possible to break any laws playing the frenchwormus wrote:*** After last weekends game against Wales Dan Cole was able to show his skill in keeping the ball above the ground with the help of his arm to prevent the score.fleabane wrote:Coles description of his antics makes me think he is a fully justified member of the FRU, and that there should be no sanctions against him for his actions.
However tonight's match in Paris he showed no such skills and fell on the line thereby causing a front row score. This offence must be reported to the FRU Front Row Union within 24 hours and the necessary citing made and possible suspension.
The Front Row Union need to meet on Sunday and arrange a hearing.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/06/ ... NE_25_.JPG