If Pollard is an 8 what is Farrell ??

[fortysix]

A 3 or 4 at most.. ??

Would Farrell get into any top team at 10-------- AB's Aussies SA Argentina Wales Ireland Scotland.....errr...no no no no no no no !!!!!

So why did Stancaster select the goon....

Oh I forgot, he doesnt run the side, Daddy Farrell does...

[MCC1964]

Oh dear God. Not another one of these threads. Peeps, it really is time to let it go.

[Maidman]

Yeah, time move on.

[fortysix]

Ha ha , fellow MCC member, but this will be re-enacted in a couple of months when Ritchie gets his way, saves having to remove himself, and Lancaster is kept in situ...

[Snorbins]

Strange how you read the headlines on these posts. Farrell would never survive at 8!
He isn't a bad player and some of the criticism he attracts from this forum is to say Is unfair.

[Cagey Tiger]

1) agree with mcc1964. If it does crop up again in the 6N, that is the time to bring it up.
2) what is this post referring to? The OP makes no sense to me. There is presumably a context which has been omitted.

[Big Dai]

Strange how you read the headlines on these posts. Farrell would never survive at 8!
He isn't a bad player http://forum.leicestertigers.com/posting.php#and some of the criticism he attracts from this forum is to say Is unfair.

I read it that way too. "Why would they play Pollard at 8?"