The Champions Cup - Fixtures announced (Updated)
Moderators: Tigerbeat, Rizzo, Tigers Press Office, Tigers Webmaster
Re: the Champions Cup
Biffer I think you've got your wires crossed about the other two teams in the champions cup will be. Wasps made up the last team when they beat Stadt Francais in the play off. So the 20 teams are 7 from the Aviva, 7 from the pro12 (including 1 italian club and 6 from the top 14. Are you referring to the subsidiary challenge cup?
Re: the Champions Cup
Qualification playoffs usually follow a standard format whereby teams play each other and the winning teams progress.biffer wrote:Still no agreement on who the other two teams in the Challenge Cup will be, or the format of the qualification.
Noddy - I think you may have your wires crossed too. I think Biffer was on about the second tier cup competition.
Re: the Champions Cup
Try not to be too patronising. You know exactly what I mean but decide to have a dig instead, lovely.
How many teams, from where, knockout single tie or two legs, or a group of four?
I thought there was meant to be an aim of developing European rugby, but it seems to be an afterthought at the moment.
How many teams, from where, knockout single tie or two legs, or a group of four?
I thought there was meant to be an aim of developing European rugby, but it seems to be an afterthought at the moment.
Re: the Champions Cup
Biffer, I'm not trying to be patronising. You asked a question and I tried to respond in a likewise condescending manner as yourself.biffer wrote:Try not to be too patronising. You know exactly what I mean but decide to have a dig instead, lovely.
How many teams, from where, knockout single tie or two legs, or a group of four?
I thought there was meant to be an aim of developing European rugby, but it seems to be an afterthought at the moment.
I have absolutely no idea what you mean at all but I do think, though, that you were simply trying to score some cheap points in your, frankly, very tired and very boring posts.
-
- Tiger Cub
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:06 am
Re: the Champions Cup
Mr Cider:cidermark wrote:The ERC is still a (dis)functional organisation. The staff who have been offered the chance to relocate were, probably, involved in the winding up of affairs at the ERC.StanUpenfite wrote:If that's the case, why weren't they asked to step in months ago? Why now - lastminute.com?
No comment on the lack of sponsors or the dogs breakfast they have made of the French TV deal guys?
We were promised a share in the region of 60 to 70 million by Bruce Craig. Not to mention financial oblivion for the Celtic League clubs. Who have ironically just secured a sponsorship deal with Guinness and have Sky paying to show games next season.
I don't think anyone involved in the negation so for the formation of a new European tournament has ever promised anyone, far less yourself Stanupenfite, that the Celtic League would suffer "financial oblivion"!
The deal with Guinness and Sky is for the Celtic League only (at the moment perhaps?). It has no bearing on the Champions Cup.
I'm going to go out on a limb here - you wouldn't happen to be a supporter of an Irish province would you? I only ask as the Ulster supporters chant - Stand Up For The Ulster Men - is very similar to your, slightly confrontational, 'Stanupenfite'.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-union/24224152
Heres one threat of 'Financial Oblivion' for a start. A number of
posters on this very forum have also been quite vocal on this matter. You are either oblivious to the point I'm making or just delibertely ignoring it.
I live in Leicestershire BTW so make no apologies for posting on a Leicester forum, even if you do find my username 'slightly confrontational'. I would of thought being located in London you would be made of sterner stuff.
-
- Bronze Member
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 10:51 pm
Re: the Champions Cup
really lost all intrest of what is going on just want it to start now
Re: the Champions Cup
May 2nd. Army/Navy game moved to accommodate.StanUpenfite wrote:So it would seem judging by the amount of hotels fully booked up in the Twickenham/Richmond area that weekend.TigerCam wrote:Cup Final at Twickers apparently?
Whoever said "one person cannot change the world' never ate undercooked bat
Re: the Champions Cup
God this is a boring example of the stuff we've endured from a small bunch of what turned out to be trolls. Dull and self-referential miniscule pointscoring, if at all.
Leicester Tigers 1995-
Nottingham 1995-2000
Swansea (Whites) 1988-95
A game played on grass in the open air by teams of XV.
Nottingham 1995-2000
Swansea (Whites) 1988-95
A game played on grass in the open air by teams of XV.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 270
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 5:00 pm
Re: the Champions Cup
Oh dear Tom, are you ever right? I'm here to impart info to you chaps & to seek some in return.TomWeston wrote:Baggy is only here trying again to wind us up with 'news' of his small triumph.
Have a look at the UAFC site to see how he and his pals, including Snipe Watson work.
http://www.uafc.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=2 ... 9&start=15
Bill,the Turkish Airlines deal had wings aplenty, legs too,sadly the disgraceful (& shaming for us all) , treatment meted out to a Turkish family in Belfast by some thuggish scum, appeared to put a nail in that coffin. It went suddenly very quickly downhill.
Finally Tom, if you care to glance through my 10000 odd posts, some extremely odd, you will not find a single negative post about any individual poster here from me. I am not responsible for the posts of others neither do I moderate the site.
Now in the wake of your Swiss based friends having to go cap in hand asking ERC to run the initial tournament, the same ERC they branded unfit for purpose, have you chap any news on any encouraging news on the commercial front. Like it or not, and I don't given the way this all came about, we are all in this together & it would be nice to hear that the cup will be financially viable.
Re: the Champions Cup
I didn't ask a question. I made a statement, which you quoted and responded to..cidermark wrote:Biffer, I'm not trying to be patronising. You asked a question and I tried to respond in a likewise condescending manner as yourself.biffer wrote:Try not to be too patronising. You know exactly what I mean but decide to have a dig instead, lovely.
How many teams, from where, knockout single tie or two legs, or a group of four?
I thought there was meant to be an aim of developing European rugby, but it seems to be an afterthought at the moment.
I have absolutely no idea what you mean at all but I do think, though, that you were simply trying to score some cheap points in your, frankly, very tired and very boring posts.
Re: the Champions Cup
Would you rather it was ignored?biffer wrote:I didn't ask a question. I made a statement, which you quoted and responded to..cidermark wrote:Biffer, I'm not trying to be patronising. You asked a question and I tried to respond in a likewise condescending manner as yourself.biffer wrote:Try not to be too patronising. You know exactly what I mean but decide to have a dig instead, lovely.
How many teams, from where, knockout single tie or two legs, or a group of four?
I thought there was meant to be an aim of developing European rugby, but it seems to be an afterthought at the moment.
I have absolutely no idea what you mean at all but I do think, though, that you were simply trying to score some cheap points in your, frankly, very tired and very boring posts.
I am neither clever enough to understand nor stupid enough to play this game
Re: the Champions Cup
Guinness confirmed as Pro 12 sponsor.
Re: the Champions Cup
So, Baggy, a year after the English league secured its finances from BT and several months after you proudly announced sponsorship from a 'prominent' Turkish airline, you finally get sponsorship from Guinness. Well done!Baggy Trousers wrote: Oh dear Tom, are you ever right? I'm here to impart info to you chaps & to seek some in return.
Bill,the Turkish Airlines deal had wings aplenty, legs too,sadly the disgraceful (& shaming for us all) , treatment meted out to a Turkish family in Belfast by some thuggish scum, appeared to put a nail in that coffin. It went suddenly very quickly downhill.
In the same tone as you and your UAFC 'pals' have used here, when will you be telling us just how much Guinness are paying?
Have our 'Swiss based friends' finally put in place a tournament to replace the ERC which was so biased in favour of your domestic league, despite your predictions, Baggy? You being a fair man, Baggy, have your delaying tactics in any way delayed the sponsorship deals which would make the competition viable, do you think, or have they added to the ability of potential sponsors to dictate terms? Will the Pro12 be better or worse off, as a whole, not just the Irish provinces who did best out of the ERC, given a mooted minimum earn of £20 million?Now in the wake of your Swiss based friends having to go cap in hand asking ERC to run the initial tournament, the same ERC they branded unfit for purpose, have you chap any news on any encouraging news on the commercial front. Like it or not, and I don't given the way this all came about, we are all in this together & it would be nice to hear that the cup will be financially viable.
Re: the Champions Cup
Hardly cap in hand. This was always the original plan as stated elsewhere and repeated on here. Of course, if that doesn't suit your agenda....Baggy Trousers wrote:Now in the wake of your Swiss based friends having to go cap in hand asking ERC to run the initial tournament
I am neither clever enough to understand nor stupid enough to play this game
Re: the Champions Cup
Pro 12 sponsorship isn't worth much, and the league has always been entirely open about that - news reports last week had the CEO saying exactly that. What's the Aviva sponsorship worth to the AP?TomWeston wrote:So, Baggy, a year after the English league secured its finances from BT and several months after you proudly announced sponsorship from a 'prominent' Turkish airline, you finally get sponsorship from Guinness. Well done!Baggy Trousers wrote: Oh dear Tom, are you ever right? I'm here to impart info to you chaps & to seek some in return.
Bill,the Turkish Airlines deal had wings aplenty, legs too,sadly the disgraceful (& shaming for us all) , treatment meted out to a Turkish family in Belfast by some thuggish scum, appeared to put a nail in that coffin. It went suddenly very quickly downhill.
In the same tone as you and your UAFC 'pals' have used here, when will you be telling us just how much Guinness are paying?
Have our 'Swiss based friends' finally put in place a tournament to replace the ERC which was so biased in favour of your domestic league, despite your predictions, Baggy? You being a fair man, Baggy, have your delaying tactics in any way delayed the sponsorship deals which would make the competition viable, do you think, or have they added to the ability of potential sponsors to dictate terms? Will the Pro12 be better or worse off, as a whole, not just the Irish provinces who did best out of the ERC, given a mooted minimum earn of £20 million?Now in the wake of your Swiss based friends having to go cap in hand asking ERC to run the initial tournament, the same ERC they branded unfit for purpose, have you chap any news on any encouraging news on the commercial front. Like it or not, and I don't given the way this all came about, we are all in this together & it would be nice to hear that the cup will be financially viable.
Has anyone got any information at all on what the European tournaments' income from TV and sponsorship is? It's all been kept very quiet. No figures on the BT and Sky deal, Canal+ rumoured to be lower than previously, but just a rumour with no confirmation. Are the English and French clubs going to be financially worse off from this given the Pro12 money is guaranteed at twenty mill?