Northampton - blind faith or rose coloured spectacles

Forum to discuss everything that is Tigers related

Moderators: Tigerbeat, Rizzo, Tigers Press Office, Tigers Webmaster

Soggypitch
Super User
Super User
Posts: 2288
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 4:18 pm
Location: Market Harborough

Re: Northampton - blind faith or rose coloured spectacles

Post by Soggypitch »

Bowden Tiger wrote:Soggypitch.
Glad my comments amused you, but his tackle wasn't legal, and imho it was a red card.He had missed him once already.
You are entitled to your opinion of course, but if that was a red card tackle then following that logic through, most games of rugby union would finish up about 5 a side.
Soggypitch
teds
Silver Member
Silver Member
Posts: 670
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 6:02 pm
Location: london

Re: Northampton - blind faith or rose coloured spectacles

Post by teds »

Lawes' head is generally on the wrong side. The net result is his tackling technique is basically a flying headbutt to the guts. It makes him more likely to injure the player he is tackling or often himself.
Bowden Tiger
Bronze Member
Bronze Member
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:12 pm
Location: Little Bowden, South Leicestershire

Re: Northampton - blind faith or rose coloured spectacles

Post by Bowden Tiger »

Soggypitch, As you live near me we must meet up for a pint sometime. I think we would have a lively debate.
However, I believe that if referees clamped down on these dangerous late tackles, the ultimate would be that they would reduce, and Rugby would be the better for it.
I also don't believe that I was the only one who thought it should have been red- ask Mr. Cockerill!
SilebyTiger
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 9:39 am

Re: Northampton - blind faith or rose coloured spectacles

Post by SilebyTiger »

The officials got it right. If Dan Cole hadn't have been there then nothing would have been made of it.
Post Reply