Greenwhiteandred wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 8:57 pm
And Foley saves us
What's the "saving"? It was a clear good decision.
Because it was poor play from us and as Austin said , very few refs would pick that up ….. therefore he saves us from poor defending and if we’d had played better in the first half it wouldn’t matter as much but we’ve let Quins still be in this match ….. that do you for “saving”?
You can only defend what is legal....
Other refs might have made a bad decision... This is not saving us.
Last edited by Pellsey on Fri Jan 26, 2024 9:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Scott1 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 8:39 pm
10-7 domination?
We’ve dominated possession and territory in H1 but we end up only 10-7 up at HT but for the happy clappers this seems acceptable. We should have had 20 points on the board but are usual issues persist - lack of attacking structure and poor skills
Who said that?
A few people seem to think the fact we’ve dominated possession and territory is acceptable but seem to ignore the scoreboard
What's the "saving"? It was a clear good decision.
Because it was poor play from us and as Austin said , very few refs would pick that up ….. therefore he saves us from poor defending and if we’d had played better in the first half it wouldn’t matter as much but we’ve let Quins still be in this match ….. that do you for “saving”?
You can only defend what is legal....
Other refs might have made a bad decision... This is not saving us.
Yeh right - you can defend better than we did for that legal or illegal.
We’ve dominated possession and territory in H1 but we end up only 10-7 up at HT but for the happy clappers this seems acceptable. We should have had 20 points on the board but are usual issues persist - lack of attacking structure and poor skills
Who said that?
A few people seem to think the fact we’ve dominated possession and territory is acceptable but seem to ignore the scoreboard
Tigers currently have more points, so that's fine with me.
