Props who can scrummage both sides
Moderators: Tigerbeat, Rizzo, Tigers Press Office, Tigers Webmaster
Props who can scrummage both sides
Being a scrum half and, having no ideas about the dark arts, I found this article to be incredibly interesting. Had Nephi on my mind whilst reading it.
https://www.rugbyworld.com/countries/so ... ead-129975
https://www.rugbyworld.com/countries/so ... ead-129975
Re: Props who can scrummage both sides
The best ever for me was John Smit. World class in all 3 front row positions imo
"Rugby isn't a contact sport,ballroom dancing is a contact sport. Rugby is a collision sport" Heyneke Meyer
Re: Props who can scrummage both sides
Nephi, Logo Mulipola, Bateman (+hooker) all played both recently, slightly longer ago but Castrogiovanni was the same too. Balmain & Cole played both for the first team in their younger days, most of the props in the development squad have played both, certainly Whitcombe played both at U18s as did Rowntree Jnr (and Rowntree Snr but that was obviously a long time ago now).
It's tricky but most props can turn their hand to it. The reason they don't is that since they added the second prop on the bench it is as McIntyre says, better to specialise in one than be half decent in both.
It's tricky but most props can turn their hand to it. The reason they don't is that since they added the second prop on the bench it is as McIntyre says, better to specialise in one than be half decent in both.
Goooooodeeeeeyyyyy!
-
- Super User
- Posts: 2076
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 12:37 am
Re: Props who can scrummage both sides
Many young props can play both sides not many are able to continue with it as they mature physically. Graham Roundtree was frankly poor as a tighthead although brilliant at loose, Castro lost the ability to play at loose head. Few have the ability to play both sides to a high standard as well as say Jason Leonard. Greg Bateman certainly played all three front row positions but was not top quality in any of them, good step though.
Re: Props who can scrummage both sides
Bateman would've made the perfect midweek Lion though ,surprised he wasn't even thought of in 2017 when he was in top formjohnthegriff wrote: ↑Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:44 am Many young props can play both sides not many are able to continue with it as they mature physically. Graham Roundtree was frankly poor as a tighthead although brilliant at loose, Castro lost the ability to play at loose head. Few have the ability to play both sides to a high standard as well as say Jason Leonard. Greg Bateman certainly played all three front row positions but was not top quality in any of them, good step though.
"Rugby isn't a contact sport,ballroom dancing is a contact sport. Rugby is a collision sport" Heyneke Meyer
-
- Super User
- Posts: 3625
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 5:30 pm
Re: Props who can scrummage both sides
Fran Cotton would have the best I’ve seen
-
- Super User
- Posts: 7241
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:27 pm
- Location: Shepshed
Re: Props who can scrummage both sides
Greg Bateman was a good squad man and when in peak form a good Prem player. He was never close to international quality in any of the three positions. His try Vs Quins was a wonder try though, left Mike Brown looking very red faced.Scott1 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:48 amBateman would've made the perfect midweek Lion though ,surprised he wasn't even thought of in 2017 when he was in top formjohnthegriff wrote: ↑Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:44 am Many young props can play both sides not many are able to continue with it as they mature physically. Graham Roundtree was frankly poor as a tighthead although brilliant at loose, Castro lost the ability to play at loose head. Few have the ability to play both sides to a high standard as well as say Jason Leonard. Greg Bateman certainly played all three front row positions but was not top quality in any of them, good step though.
Re: Props who can scrummage both sides
The requirement to have a full front row took away the emphasis on having props capable of playing on both sides so specialism increased.
Jason Leonard was perhaps the last of that era of international quality on both sides in terms of English players.
As for Bateman, I felt we made a mistake in converting him to prop. He could have perhaps played at a higher level but we, at the time favoured shorter hookers. (Perhaps one of Cockers weaknesses, or a recognition he was competing for a starting berth with an international in Tom Youngs)
Jason Leonard was perhaps the last of that era of international quality on both sides in terms of English players.
As for Bateman, I felt we made a mistake in converting him to prop. He could have perhaps played at a higher level but we, at the time favoured shorter hookers. (Perhaps one of Cockers weaknesses, or a recognition he was competing for a starting berth with an international in Tom Youngs)
-
- Super User
- Posts: 3625
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 5:30 pm
Re: Props who can scrummage both sides
I agree, a hooker who has converted to a prop is a real asset when returning to hooker because to the. Incremental power gained.
I found I became a much more powerful hooker after I had played tighthead for many years . Sadly my throwing in became rubbish due to shoulder problems!
I would definitely have put Bateman back to hooker
I found I became a much more powerful hooker after I had played tighthead for many years . Sadly my throwing in became rubbish due to shoulder problems!
I would definitely have put Bateman back to hooker
-
- Super User
- Posts: 2076
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 12:37 am
Re: Props who can scrummage both sides
I believe it was Bateman who decided he didn't want to be considered as a hooker and I don't think Cocker had any particular preference for smaller hookers, Ben Kayser was not short it is just that the job ideally needs someone of about 5'10 or less and Bateman certainly fitted into that category.
Re: Props who can scrummage both sides
We so rarely get props who can play on both sides now because you need natural talent to be able to do it and they select players into the system so young nowadays.
They select size and coach it because that is what the youth and senior playing systems currently dictate.
Youngsters are picked and the rest mostly cast aside at 15/16 years old.
Obviously size matters, they've got to be able to attain a certain size to be strong enough at the top level.
At the same time though you've got to exhaust the time for lads to actually grow to their full potential and if you don't exhaust that time needed for growth then potential talent is probably being wasted, but I am not even sure it is what modern coaches want anyway because rugby playing tactics have become so micromanaged.
Senior Italian and Argentinian props were so much more talented before they started taking the age grade competitions more seriously.
Mulipola and Sio were chalk and cheese and in how and when they were plucked out showed something.
They select size and coach it because that is what the youth and senior playing systems currently dictate.
Youngsters are picked and the rest mostly cast aside at 15/16 years old.
Obviously size matters, they've got to be able to attain a certain size to be strong enough at the top level.
At the same time though you've got to exhaust the time for lads to actually grow to their full potential and if you don't exhaust that time needed for growth then potential talent is probably being wasted, but I am not even sure it is what modern coaches want anyway because rugby playing tactics have become so micromanaged.
Senior Italian and Argentinian props were so much more talented before they started taking the age grade competitions more seriously.
Mulipola and Sio were chalk and cheese and in how and when they were plucked out showed something.