Saints v Tigers - 09th January 2021 - cancelled due to COVID
Moderators: Tigerbeat, Rizzo, Tigers Press Office, Tigers Webmaster
Re: Saints v Tigers - 09th January 2021 - cancelled due to COVID
I think a warm-up against Saracens, Ealing or maybe even Cornish Pirates might be a good idea.
Formerly of Burbaaage (not Inkleh), now up north at uni
Re: Saints v Tigers - 09th January 2021 - cancelled due to COVID
Just being "devils advocate", but by Saints deciding to announce they could play as they have 23 available, is this a calculated announcement to try to avoid a 2-4 points against them and hope that the ruling does not go against them and the ruling committee give them say 3-3 points? What is the point situation if the committee overseeing the postponement does agree with the club?
Re: Saints v Tigers - 09th January 2021 - cancelled due to COVID
Having 23 players of tried Prem standard is different from having 23 players.LE18 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 06, 2021 7:37 pm Just being "devils advocate", but by Saints deciding to announce they could play as they have 23 available, is this a calculated announcement to try to avoid a 2-4 points against them and hope that the ruling does not go against them and the ruling committee give them say 3-3 points? What is the point situation if the committee overseeing the postponement does agree with the club?
Leicester Tigers 1995-
Nottingham 1995-2000
Swansea (Whites) 1988-95
A game played on grass in the open air by teams of XV.
Nottingham 1995-2000
Swansea (Whites) 1988-95
A game played on grass in the open air by teams of XV.
-
- Super User
- Posts: 4909
- Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2019 1:01 pm
Re: Saints v Tigers - 09th January 2021 - cancelled due to COVID
If they have 23 available then surely the game goes aheadLE18 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 06, 2021 7:37 pm Just being "devils advocate", but by Saints deciding to announce they could play as they have 23 available, is this a calculated announcement to try to avoid a 2-4 points against them and hope that the ruling does not go against them and the ruling committee give them say 3-3 points? What is the point situation if the committee overseeing the postponement does agree with the club?
-
- Super User
- Posts: 3911
- Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 11:53 am
- Location: The Salt Mines
Re: Saints v Tigers - 09th January 2021 - cancelled due to COVID
I am yet to see the logic or sense of trying to play any elite sport in the current climate & that's before we get to the panto of the league table.
Someone no doubt will say Elite Sport being played provides a distraction, but if a lot of it isn't being played due to Covid it's a moot point.
BT aren't giving me a rebate for lack of product..
Someone no doubt will say Elite Sport being played provides a distraction, but if a lot of it isn't being played due to Covid it's a moot point.
BT aren't giving me a rebate for lack of product..
To win is not as important as playing with style!
Re: Saints v Tigers - 09th January 2021 - cancelled due to COVID
If everyone else is working why can't sports people?
-
- Super User
- Posts: 3911
- Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 11:53 am
- Location: The Salt Mines
Re: Saints v Tigers - 09th January 2021 - cancelled due to COVID
Hardly essential work sport....
I am sure all those in hospitality & the retail sector would like to be working.
Last edited by Wayne Richardson Fan Club on Wed Jan 06, 2021 9:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
To win is not as important as playing with style!
Re: Saints v Tigers - 09th January 2021 - cancelled due to COVID
££££ and sanityWayne Richardson Fan Club wrote: ↑Wed Jan 06, 2021 8:32 pm I am yet to see the logic or sense of trying to play any elite sport in the current climate & that's before we get to the panto of the league table.
Define "a lot"? The vast majority is being played.Wayne Richardson Fan Club wrote: ↑Wed Jan 06, 2021 8:32 pmSomeone no doubt will say Elite Sport being played provides a distraction, but if a lot of it isn't being played due to Covid it's a moot point.
No but they don't guarantee their content either.Wayne Richardson Fan Club wrote: ↑Wed Jan 06, 2021 8:32 pmBT aren't giving me a rebate for lack of product..
As I said above I am biased because I want something to watch and relieve the boredom of lockdown. If the authorities decide it is unsafe and stop it though, I can live with it and wouldn't complain.
Re: Saints v Tigers - 09th January 2021 - cancelled due to COVID
Elite sport is subject to strict protocols and regular testing. It is in a controlled and monitored environment and clubs react accordingly.
SUPPORT THE MATT HAMPSON TRUST
www.matthampson.co.uk
www.matthampson.co.uk
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 1134
- Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 9:18 am
- Location: Over the hill and far away
Re: Saints v Tigers - 09th January 2021 - cancelled due to COVID
Exactly - and that’s why the show will go on, probably until long after those who care have concluded it’s a farce (so not long now) or the effect of the vaccine is to release us all (but certainly not before the end of March).Wayne Richardson Fan Club wrote: ↑Wed Jan 06, 2021 8:32 pm.
BT aren't giving me a rebate for lack of product..
Re: Saints v Tigers - 09th January 2021 - cancelled due to COVID
Take my money!ABClub wrote: ↑Wed Jan 06, 2021 4:56 pm A friendly between the squad, on LTTV would be brilliant.
1.Genge 2.Youngs 3.Heyes 4.Lavanini 5.Wells 6.Brink 7.Reffell 8.Wiese
9.JvP 10.Ford 11.van Wyk 12.Porter 13.Moroni 14.Potter 15.Steward
1.Leatigaga 2.Clare 3.Cole 4.Green 5.Martin 6.Liebenberg 7.Wallace 8.Taufua
9.Youngs 10. Henry 11.Nadolo 12.Scott 13.Kelly 14.Simmons 15.Murimurivalu
Brett Deacon in charge of one side, Matt Smith the other, with the senior coaches taking a chance to oversee everyone's performance. Youngs brothers skippering opposing sides. Letters instead of numbers on the shirts. Bondi and Matt Tait commentating, Steve Johnson as summariser. Ready, set, go.
"Rugby isn't a contact sport,ballroom dancing is a contact sport. Rugby is a collision sport" Heyneke Meyer
Re: Saints v Tigers - 09th January 2021 - cancelled due to COVID
Either they have 23 players fit to play under the Covid rules or they don’t.
If they have then why are they being told not to play? or does that mean that whilst those players are fit they are being required to self isolate.
Have they got 23 players who can play under the regulations. If not then presumably the points are awarded 4:2 to Tigers.
If they have 23 players fit and free to play under the Covid rules, including the requisite front row, then who is advising them not to play? If it is not as per the regs then it should be 5:0 to Tigers as choosing not to play is not an option without a valid reason.
If they have then why are they being told not to play? or does that mean that whilst those players are fit they are being required to self isolate.
Have they got 23 players who can play under the regulations. If not then presumably the points are awarded 4:2 to Tigers.
If they have 23 players fit and free to play under the Covid rules, including the requisite front row, then who is advising them not to play? If it is not as per the regs then it should be 5:0 to Tigers as choosing not to play is not an option without a valid reason.
-
- Super User
- Posts: 2910
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2017 1:01 pm
- Location: Over The Hills & Far Away
Re: Saints v Tigers - 09th January 2021 - cancelled due to COVID
Taking into account circumstances and the near certainty that Exeter Vs Bristol goes ahead (despite positive tests for Exeter) it would be nice to know the exact criteria with regard to cancellation of fixtures as things do appear a little hazy right now :
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/55559922
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/55559922
Seemingly heading rapidly toward senility .....Not long or far to go now , in fact, getting worse daily.....
-
- Super User
- Posts: 2910
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2017 1:01 pm
- Location: Over The Hills & Far Away
Re: Saints v Tigers - 09th January 2021 - cancelled due to COVID
Meantime , additional measures announced to (hopefully) limit the transmission of Covid :
https://www.rugbypass.com/news/ice-bath ... protocols/
https://www.rugbypass.com/news/ice-bath ... protocols/
Seemingly heading rapidly toward senility .....Not long or far to go now , in fact, getting worse daily.....