It's not just RIL that is saying we have missed Cordero, a few fans with insider knowledge are saying the same thingsLeicestertinytiger wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 11:28 am Until anything is anounced, we don’t know what has happened. Inside Rugby Line just spouts rubbish and so much of it on a daily basis sometimes it happens to be true.
However would be another blow if we fail to sign him. How many players have we come out publicly saying we’re interested in, that Aussie 8, Mafi now Cordero and none of them sign. Why aren’t these players choosing to join us, doesn’t look great, hope this rumour is wrong.
LEICESTER TIGERS 2017/18 SQUAD/TRANSFERS/CONTRACT THREAD PART 2!!
Moderators: Tigerbeat, Rizzo, Tigers Press Office, Tigers Webmaster
Re: LEICESTER TIGERS 2017/18 SQUAD/TRANSFERS/CONTRACT THREAD PART 2!!
Re: LEICESTER TIGERS 2017/18 SQUAD/TRANSFERS/CONTRACT THREAD PART 2!!
What Aussie 8?
Formerly of Burbaaage (not Inkleh), now up north at uni
-
- Super User
- Posts: 3047
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 2:22 pm
Re: LEICESTER TIGERS 2017/18 SQUAD/TRANSFERS/CONTRACT THREAD PART 2!!
Ages ago from last season, can’t remember his name.
Re: LEICESTER TIGERS 2017/18 SQUAD/TRANSFERS/CONTRACT THREAD PART 2!!
Leicestertinytiger wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 2:20 pm Ages ago from last season, can’t remember his name.
Cyle brink? He's South African
-
- Super User
- Posts: 3047
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 2:22 pm
Re: LEICESTER TIGERS 2017/18 SQUAD/TRANSFERS/CONTRACT THREAD PART 2!!
Scott Higginbotham wasn’t it?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 10:48 am
- Location: leicester Crumbie Stand/ Captains bar
Re: LEICESTER TIGERS 2017/18 SQUAD/TRANSFERS/CONTRACT THREAD PART 2!!
Would love him here, yes. A real driving forward forward with a huge engine
-
- Super User
- Posts: 3047
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 2:22 pm
Re: LEICESTER TIGERS 2017/18 SQUAD/TRANSFERS/CONTRACT THREAD PART 2!!
Anyone thinking it might be Magic Monday today?
Re: LEICESTER TIGERS 2017/18 SQUAD/TRANSFERS/CONTRACT THREAD PART 2!!
After tragic Sunday you mean?
I'm not cynical just experienced
Re: LEICESTER TIGERS 2017/18 SQUAD/TRANSFERS/CONTRACT THREAD PART 2!!
No I don't think it will be Magic Monday today I'm afraid
Formerly of Burbaaage (not Inkleh), now up north at uni
-
- Super User
- Posts: 4109
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:13 am
Re: LEICESTER TIGERS 2017/18 SQUAD/TRANSFERS/CONTRACT THREAD PART 2!!
Today is actually 'Blue Monday', supposedly the most depressing day of the year! Wouldn't you know it!
Happy days clearing straw from the pitch before the Baa-Baas games! KBO
Wear a Mask>Protect The NHS>Save Lives
Wear a Mask>Protect The NHS>Save Lives
-
- Super User
- Posts: 13557
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 12:54 pm
Re: LEICESTER TIGERS 2017/18 SQUAD/TRANSFERS/CONTRACT THREAD PART 2!!
Ben Betts off to get more game time.
Not sure why we had Baumann ahead of him really esp since he wasn't being played.
Not sure why we had Baumann ahead of him really esp since he wasn't being played.
-
- Super User
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 9:30 pm
- Location: Lincoln
Re: LEICESTER TIGERS 2017/18 SQUAD/TRANSFERS/CONTRACT THREAD PART 2!!
That is annoying. I agree entirely; why on earth have we been persisting with Baumann in the matchday 23 when there's plainly been no interest in playing him after he was embarrassed against Bath in the AWC.
Ben Betts speaks about his decision to leave Tigers
Re: LEICESTER TIGERS 2017/18 SQUAD/TRANSFERS/CONTRACT THREAD PART 2!!
You have to wonder how many may follow, we’ve got 5 away with the under20s I’m sure there will be teams telling them there they get more game time than they will here, and all they’ll have to point out is how little game time Evans, well and Thacker get, compared with players of a similar age if not under at other clubs.RagingBull wrote: ↑Wed Jan 17, 2018 11:40 am Ben Betts off to get more game time.
Not sure why we had Baumann ahead of him really esp since he wasn't being played.
Re: LEICESTER TIGERS 2017/18 SQUAD/TRANSFERS/CONTRACT THREAD PART 2!!
It's getting harder and harder to keep arguing that MOC deserves more time.
We don't yet know how good Betts will become, but he's surely worth keeping hold of - and it sounds like using him instead of Baumann would have been enough. Crazy.
We don't yet know how good Betts will become, but he's surely worth keeping hold of - and it sounds like using him instead of Baumann would have been enough. Crazy.