Owen Farrell

Forum to discuss everything that is Tigers related

Moderators: Tigerbeat, Rizzo, Tigers Press Office, Tigers Webmaster

G.K
Super User
Super User
Posts: 5787
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 10:19 am
Location: See SatNav

Re: Owen Farrell

Post by G.K »

Unfortunately Farrell (and Robshaw) are shoe in's no matter how badly they play. Every England coach for the last decade or so has had similar blind spots and these two are Lancasters. Centres and Wings are a revolving door in the hope that Lancaster can find someone, anyone that can fit in with OF.
Nowadays referees decide matches, players by how much.
TigerCam
Super User
Super User
Posts: 3916
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 5:41 pm
Location: Cambridge

Re: Owen Farrell

Post by TigerCam »

Owen who? :smt017
Whoever said "one person cannot change the world' never ate undercooked bat
Nailsworthstiger
Bronze Member
Bronze Member
Posts: 495
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:44 am
Location: Out in the sticks

Re: Owen Farrell

Post by Nailsworthstiger »

baz1664 wrote: three defeats against the Southern Hemisphere big 3 could be devastating for Lancaster!!
Don't think Lancaster will worry too much about that when his contract has another 6 years to go!
jgriffin
Super User
Super User
Posts: 8094
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 5:49 pm
Location: On the edge of oblivion

Re: Owen Farrell

Post by jgriffin »

Nailsworthstiger wrote:
baz1664 wrote: three defeats against the Southern Hemisphere big 3 could be devastating for Lancaster!!
Don't think Lancaster will worry too much about that when his contract has another 6 years to go!
Alas for England he may not get that far, indeed may not get much further than Xmas if the meeja really go for him. It takes one or two more to go agin' him and a tipping point may be reached.
Alas for England, equally, he may survive to take us to group disaster in the WC. We need Wales to malfunction badly next year. Imagine what Schmidt would do with our player resources. :smt018
Leicester Tigers 1995-
Nottingham 1995-2000
Swansea (Whites) 1988-95
A game played on grass in the open air by teams of XV.
Nailsworthstiger
Bronze Member
Bronze Member
Posts: 495
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:44 am
Location: Out in the sticks

Re: Owen Farrell

Post by Nailsworthstiger »

jgriffin wrote:
Nailsworthstiger wrote:
baz1664 wrote: three defeats against the Southern Hemisphere big 3 could be devastating for Lancaster!!
Don't think Lancaster will worry too much about that when his contract has another 6 years to go!
Alas for England he may not get that far, indeed may not get much further than Xmas if the meeja really go for him. It takes one or two more to go agin' him and a tipping point may be reached.
Alas for England, equally, he may survive to take us to group disaster in the WC. We need Wales to malfunction badly next year. Imagine what Schmidt would do with our player resources. :smt018
I really cannot see the "Old Farts" allowing to get egg on their face.
jonlin
Bronze Member
Bronze Member
Posts: 421
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:51 pm

Re: Owen Farrell

Post by jonlin »

Nepotism rules.
JackFlashJonny
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1909
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 11:45 am

Re: Owen Farrell

Post by JackFlashJonny »

When you actually consider his play he is woefully inadequate in all areas except those that seem to be King for this England team being Defence and goal kicking..I would rather see any 10 from Cipriani, Ford, Myler, Slade or Burns in the slot if only there was another kicker on the field who could slot those kicks (mainly in Ford and Burn's case) I am hoping that Slade is the future as I think he is a classy player who has everything needed!
northerntiger
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 853
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:03 am

Re: Owen Farrell

Post by northerntiger »

There are many things that annoy me about the whole Farrel thing, but the one that irritates me particularly is how some pundits (Cleary, Woodward) have conceded he is not the best option at 10, so he therefore ought to play at 12. Any ideas why? Apart from nepotism, obviously
Will S
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1531
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 5:21 pm
Location: Leicester

Re: Owen Farrell

Post by Will S »

northerntiger wrote:There are many things that annoy me about the whole Farrel thing, but the one that irritates me particularly is how some pundits (Cleary, Woodward) have conceded he is not the best option at 10, so he therefore ought to play at 12. Any ideas why? Apart from nepotism, obviously
Because most of them are resigned to the fact that we struggle to score trys against the top teams, or at the very least we only convert a relatively low proportion of our try scoring opportunities. Therefore, to stand any chance against these teams, we need someone on the pitch who can kick goals from anywhere. The hope is a lot of 3 point penalties and a strong defence will win us the game.
jgriffin
Super User
Super User
Posts: 8094
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 5:49 pm
Location: On the edge of oblivion

Re: Owen Farrell

Post by jgriffin »

Will S wrote:
northerntiger wrote:There are many things that annoy me about the whole Farrel thing, but the one that irritates me particularly is how some pundits (Cleary, Woodward) have conceded he is not the best option at 10, so he therefore ought to play at 12. Any ideas why? Apart from nepotism, obviously
Because most of them are resigned to the fact that we struggle to score trys against the top teams, or at the very least we only convert a relatively low proportion of our try scoring opportunities. Therefore, to stand any chance against these teams, we need someone on the pitch who can kick goals from anywhere. The hope is a lot of 3 point penalties and a strong defence will win us the game.
I think you are correct in your analysis, but this is a failure of strategy. We have IMO good enough players, but have suffered from the lack of investment on the flair side. SL's side is built to avoid losing, which is nowhere near playing to win.
Apparently Cockers team at halftime against Sale was that, if we are going to lose, let's lose while trying to win. England do not have that philosophy.
Leicester Tigers 1995-
Nottingham 1995-2000
Swansea (Whites) 1988-95
A game played on grass in the open air by teams of XV.
Jay C
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1464
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 1:10 pm

Re: Owen Farrell

Post by Jay C »

jgriffin wrote: this is a failure of strategy. We have IMO good enough players, but have suffered from the lack of investment on the flair side. SL's side is built to avoid losing, which is nowhere near playing to win.
Apparently Cockers talk at halftime against Sale was that, if we are going to lose, let's lose while trying to win. England do not have that philosophy.
I agree with you jg, but surely picking May, Eastmond & Watson is an indication that Lancaster is looking to include more attack minded players ?
Picking a midfield 10/12/13 of Myler/Farrell/Barritt with Yarde or Nowell in place of May would look much more "defensively sound" surely ? It would certainly look less threatening in attack !!
ellis9
Super User
Super User
Posts: 4187
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 6:44 pm
Location: Birmingham

Re: Owen Farrell

Post by ellis9 »

I read in the media today that Lancaster is considering dropping Farrell and Care for the South Africa game saying the exit kicking from the half backs wasn't good enough
sapajo
Super User
Super User
Posts: 6175
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 7:48 pm

Re: Owen Farrell

Post by sapajo »

ellis9 wrote:I read in the media today that Lancaster is considering dropping Farrell and Care for the South Africa game saying the exit kicking from the half backs wasn't good enough
The kicking from both of them was not good enough but I do not believe either player will be dropped. Farrell has never been dropped regardless of form.
Without hope we are nothing, keep the faith, a Tiger for eternity
Jeremy Anderson
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1043
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 6:37 pm
Location: Kenilworth

Re: Owen Farrell

Post by Jeremy Anderson »

Jay C wrote:
jgriffin wrote: this is a failure of strategy. We have IMO good enough players, but have suffered from the lack of investment on the flair side. SL's side is built to avoid losing, which is nowhere near playing to win.
Apparently Cockers talk at halftime against Sale was that, if we are going to lose, let's lose while trying to win. England do not have that philosophy.
I agree with you jg, but surely picking May, Eastmond & Watson is an indication that Lancaster is looking to include more attack minded players ?
Picking a midfield 10/12/13 of Myler/Farrell/Barritt with Yarde or Nowell in place of May would look much more "defensively sound" surely ? It would certainly look less threatening in attack !!
No point having Eastman, Watson, May and Roko on the pitch if all 9 and 10 do is kick badly. No attacking moves down the back line at all just poor kick / chase. Thank goodness May got his hand on the ball once and as did Eastman who floated what should have been a scoring pass to Brown.
Jez

Only Winners Win!
G.K
Super User
Super User
Posts: 5787
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 10:19 am
Location: See SatNav

Re: Owen Farrell

Post by G.K »

sapajo wrote:
ellis9 wrote:I read in the media today that Lancaster is considering dropping Farrell and Care for the South Africa game saying the exit kicking from the half backs wasn't good enough
The kicking from both of them was not good enough but I do not believe either player will be dropped. Farrell has never been dropped regardless of form.
If you read that in the media then I'd say it was because Lanacster made sure it was leaked and hence was a testing the water situation.

We had the same thing with Manu at wing in the summer (which was as I predicted a failure).

My guess is that Farrell will start at 12, Youngs at 9 and Ford at 10.
Nowadays referees decide matches, players by how much.
Post Reply