Only English Club with two wins in Europe

[biffer]

Not bad, all things considered.

[drc_007]

Quins?

[biffer]

Quins?

Yeah but one of those was against another English club so it doesn't count.

[Darc Tiger]

Quins?

Yeah but one of those was against another English club so it doesn't count.

[biffer]

Quins?

Yeah but one of those was against another English club so it doesn't count.

[WhitecapTiger]

Quins?

Yeah but one of those was against another English club so it doesn't count.

How very bizarre! Team nationalities matter not when the match is played in the Heineken EUROPEAN Cup, so counts very much.

[biffer]

Quins?

Yeah but one of those was against another English club so it doesn't count.

How very bizarre! Team nationalities matter not when the match is played in the Heineken EUROPEAN Cup, so counts very much.

Are you from 1836?

[fleabane]

Is this another (inaccurate!) attempt by Biffer to be controversial?

[WhitecapTiger]

I have tried to understand your reference....to no avail. Therefore I cannot answer other than to say, I don't think so. Merely pointing out an inaccuracy in your post, Quins are an English club, they have won 2 matches in the European competition, therefore we are not the only English club with 2 wins in europe. Despite your rather strange comments.

Is this another (inaccurate!) attempt by Biffer to be controversial?

It's inaccurate indeed fleabane. Controversial? Hmmmm, can think of other words. No doubt there'll be a 'thanks for your input' or some other inane response. Seems to be the way when the opposing argument is more factually correct.

[kingol22]

Newcastle have also won 2 games in europe and by this evening Wasps will probably of done likewise.

[biffer]

I have tried to understand your reference....to no avail. Therefore I cannot answer other than to say, I don't think so. Merely pointing out an inaccuracy in your post, Quins are an English club, they have won 2 matches in the European competition, therefore we are not the only English club with 2 wins in europe. Despite your rather strange comments.

Is this another (inaccurate!) attempt by Biffer to be controversial?

It's inaccurate indeed fleabane. Controversial? Hmmmm, can think of other words. No doubt there'll be a 'thanks for your input' or some other inane response. Seems to be the way when the opposing argument is more factually correct.

I'd forgotten about Gloucester to be honest (easily done).

The 1836 thing was because your language seemed a bit archaic, but I didn't expect anyone to notice due to the general lack of any humour on here

[fleabane]

There is plenty of humour, but little tolerance of inane, juvenile threads and posts. This applies, in particular, to those which are intended solely to rile, or where the poster continues to post facetiously.

[biffer]

There is plenty of humour, but little tolerance of inane, juvenile threads and posts. This applies, in particular, to those which are intended solely to rile, or where the poster continues to post facetiously.

[BJ.]

It appears the wide page problem has returned and I assume the URL on the post three above this one is responsible. Could the author or a moderator please amend the URL either by using tinyurl or simply deleting it as it isn't germane to the post.

[WhitecapTiger]

URL Taken out of my original post to see if widescreen rectified, not worked. Have to get buffer to delete too?