Citings

bluntiger · Post by **bluntiger** » Mon Sep 28, 2009 4:23 pm

I really hope Olivier Azam (Gloucester) is cited for his stud work on Borthwick, it looked deliberate and clearly extremely dangerous. He could have lost his sight and needs to be treated in the same way as gauging - 6 months ban.

Also, Antony Allen may well be cited for that spear tackle. Very similar to the Ellis effort on Dan Carter and he got 8 weeks if my memory is correct! If he does get banned, and Geordan is out for a few weeks it will mean a call-up for either 36 or Amorisino!

Tigerbeat · Post by **Tigerbeat** » Mon Sep 28, 2009 4:26 pm

Anthony Allen was told by Nigel Owens that he would have had more coming to him ( eg a yellow card) as it was a dangerous tackle but NOT a spear tackle.
This is very audible in the commentary during the game.

fallingwithstyle · Post by **fallingwithstyle** » Mon Sep 28, 2009 4:28 pm

Haven't seem the Azam incident yet just the photos of Borthwick which are gruesome. Given Azam's record (and Sarries anger) a citing though seems inevitable. Which will give Glaws supporters another opportunity to moan that 'no-one likes them, it's not fair!'

With A.A. sadly a citing does seem probable too. Hopefully they'll go easy on him - can't think he's been cited before.

TnA · Post by **TnA** » Mon Sep 28, 2009 6:18 pm

Allen shouldn't be cited. As previously stated, it was not a spear tackle. It was deemed dangerous enough for a penalty at the time, but not even dangerous enough for a yellow card. The incident was dealt with by the on pitch officials correctly. Penalty, 3 points. End of story.

Azam however needs a good few months off to think about what he did (intentionally). Outragious.

Bill W (2) · Post by **Bill W (2)** » Mon Sep 28, 2009 6:22 pm

Concur.

If the slo mo replay shows Little made no attempt to wrap his arms he risks a citing.

Hull Fan · Post by **Hull Fan** » Mon Sep 28, 2009 6:42 pm

Don't think Allen will be cited, also doubt that Little will be either. Although i do think he warrants it but doubt it will happen.

Bill W (2) · Post by **Bill W (2)** » Mon Sep 28, 2009 7:28 pm

Not too much time left for Little or Allan to be cited.

Another 24 hours for Azam.

Tircoeds · Post by **Tircoeds** » Mon Sep 28, 2009 8:03 pm

fallingwithstyle wrote:Haven't seem the Azam incident yet just the photos of Borthwick which are gruesome. Given Azam's record (and Sarries anger) a citing though seems inevitable. Which will give Glaws supporters another opportunity to moan that 'no-one likes them, it's not fair!'.

In all fairness, they aren't the only ones to make this claim.

I haven't seen the Azam incident either, but as you say, given his record, play acting and so on, if I was on the panel, I would find it difficult not to hand out a lengthy ban, even if he was innocent. I realise this flies in the face of justice for all, but I just cant help myself, there are some you like and some you don't !
He deserved 6 months for the dive he took when Tom James :censored: slapped him (with his head).

CoalvilleBob · Post by **CoalvilleBob** » Tue Sep 29, 2009 9:32 am

Tircoeds wrote:
fallingwithstyle wrote:Haven't seem the Azam incident yet just the photos of Borthwick which are gruesome. Given Azam's record (and Sarries anger) a citing though seems inevitable. Which will give Glaws supporters another opportunity to moan that 'no-one likes them, it's not fair!'.
In all fairness, they aren't the only ones to make this claim.

In even more fairness I looked at their Shedweb site today and the majority are saying that Azam deserves all he gets. That's not often said when its a Tiger in the dock.

fallingwithstyle · Post by **fallingwithstyle** » Tue Sep 29, 2009 10:47 am

Fair point, guys. The ShedWeb site does seem to be surprisingly rational about what happened.

bluntiger · Post by **bluntiger** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:51 am

I am shocked there is no sightings of any citings and I guess it is too late now!

CoalvilleBob · Post by **CoalvilleBob** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 1:33 pm

bluntiger wrote:I am shocked there is no sightings of any citings and I guess it is too late now!

I think Bill's got the timings wrong. I believe it's four working days after the game and that would mean they can be cited up until the end of tomorrow. Am sure that's true for the Sunday game (Azam) because Andy Hazell kicked someone in a Sunday game in week 1 and got cited on the Thursday.

Bill W (2) · Post by **Bill W (2)** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 2:33 pm

CoalvilleBob wrote:
bluntiger wrote:I am shocked there is no sightings of any citings and I guess it is too late now!
I think Bill's got the timings wrong. I believe it's four working days after the game and that would mean they can be cited up until the end of tomorrow. Am sure that's true for the Sunday game (Azam) because Andy Hazell kicked someone in a Sunday game in week 1 and got cited on the Thursday.

I could be wrong - would not be the first (or last) time.

dailywaffle · Post by **dailywaffle** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:18 pm

CoalvilleBob wrote:
bluntiger wrote:I am shocked there is no sightings of any citings and I guess it is too late now!
I think Bill's got the timings wrong. I believe it's four working days after the game and that would mean they can be cited up until the end of tomorrow. Am sure that's true for the Sunday game (Azam) because Andy Hazell kicked someone in a Sunday game in week 1 and got cited on the Thursday.

Four working days is correct (for the GP).

Leicester Tigers

Citings

Citings

Re: Citings

Re: Citings

Re: Citings

Re: Citings

Re: Citings

Re: Citings

Re: Citings

Re: Citings

Re: Citings

Re: Citings

Re: Citings

Re: Citings

Re: Citings