Lions Agreement?
Moderators: Tigerbeat, Rizzo, Tigers Press Office, Tigers Webmaster
Lions Agreement?
Croft and Ellis did not play on Friday night because of a Lions agreement. So how come Quins played Monye and Bath brought on Mears? There is probally more that I havnt noticed. Also just making sure that our two Lions are eligible to be picked next week? As Quins looked dangerous. Can someone inform me please
Re: Lions Agreement?
Monye and Mears did not play in the last test?
Guessing!
Guessing!
The opinion expressed above is that of the author and does not imply any acceptance of it by Leicester Football Club PLC or their agents who in no way share responsibility with the author for its publication.
MJLTAW 2007
MOPAW 2007
MJLTAW 2007
MOPAW 2007
Re: Lions Agreement?
neither did croft
Re: Lions Agreement?
Believe Mike Phillips started for Ospreys ? Is this agreement only with GP clubs and even then is there different interpretations between the clubs ?
To quote Ray Gravell - You've got to get your first tackle in early, even if it's late.
Owain Glyndŵr now he was a man of vision.
Owain Glyndŵr now he was a man of vision.
Re: Lions Agreement?
Kingol22, Croft did play in the last test. He was on the bench.
And seaweed, the agreement is only for EPS players (ie the English ones) as it forms part of the RFU/PRL agreement.
As such, Welsh clubs are not affected by it.
Like Crofty, Monye also played in the 3rd Test but I believe that he was originally in the Saxons section of the 2008/09 EPS squad & not the Test section. Therefore the mandatory rest period did not apply to him.
And seaweed, the agreement is only for EPS players (ie the English ones) as it forms part of the RFU/PRL agreement.
As such, Welsh clubs are not affected by it.
Like Crofty, Monye also played in the 3rd Test but I believe that he was originally in the Saxons section of the 2008/09 EPS squad & not the Test section. Therefore the mandatory rest period did not apply to him.
Re: Lions Agreement?
So they both should feature in the game against Quins?
Re: Lions Agreement?
Depends if it is before the end of the mandatory rest period I guess.
Previously players have missed the first TWO games.
Previously players have missed the first TWO games.
Re: Lions Agreement?
Is the rest peroid from the end of the Lions tour or a mandatory period from the end of the season, which could be split with the Lions tour in the middle?
If so then the Quins players had an extra two weeks break before the Lions as we had the two final, so they could come back two weeks earlier? Maybe?
If so then the Quins players had an extra two weeks break before the Lions as we had the two final, so they could come back two weeks earlier? Maybe?
"The beast got us, the Leicester beast."
Re: Lions Agreement?
I don't get why they really need the rest period in any case??
It is not as though the Lions test was last week - they would have had plenty of time to recover by now.
It is not as though the Lions test was last week - they would have had plenty of time to recover by now.
-
- Top Cat
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 4:55 pm
Re: Lions Agreement?
I assume they get a mandatory holiday period after the finish of the Lions tour, probably about four weeks. They probably wouldn't have been back training until the start of August at the earliest and it's in the best interests of the player's long-term health to get a proper pre-season done. If the players were rushed back I reckon they'd pay for it later in the season.Will S wrote:I don't get why they really need the rest period in any case??
It is not as though the Lions test was last week - they would have had plenty of time to recover by now.
In Ireland we won't be seeing the Lions players until the end of September. Count yourselves lucky you only had two reps.
Re: Lions Agreement?
I think it is fair if everyone abides by the same rules. What we are questioning is why Monye and Mears played at the weekend but Croft and Ellis did not.
Always a Tiger
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 1227
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 10:18 am
- Location: Leicestershire, UK
Re: Lions Agreement?
Croft came on and played against Munster only a week and a half ago?
Re: Lions Agreement?
That was a friendly - they do not count!chipnchase wrote:Croft came on and played against Munster only a week and a half ago?
The opinion expressed above is that of the author and does not imply any acceptance of it by Leicester Football Club PLC or their agents who in no way share responsibility with the author for its publication.
MJLTAW 2007
MOPAW 2007
MJLTAW 2007
MOPAW 2007
Re: Lions Agreement?
I understood that Croft was not 'eligable' for the Sale game under EPS regulations. But how did that not apply to Monye or Mears?chipnchase wrote:Croft came on and played against Munster only a week and a half ago?
Always a Tiger
Re: Lions Agreement?
We've already explained why Mears & Monye were able to play:
Mears didn't play in the final Lions Test and therefore wouldn't have had to wait as long as those who did.
Monye wasn't in the Senior EPS (he was in the Saxons one) and therefore doesn't have to have the mandatory rest period as it doesn't apply to the Saxons squad.
Mears didn't play in the final Lions Test and therefore wouldn't have had to wait as long as those who did.
Monye wasn't in the Senior EPS (he was in the Saxons one) and therefore doesn't have to have the mandatory rest period as it doesn't apply to the Saxons squad.