shocking news- Floyd Landis tests positive for testosterone

Non- Rugby Related Chat. Please note that this forum is moderated. If you wish to make comments for the club's attention please do so in Fans Forum and not this one.

Moderators: Tigerbeat, Rizzo, Tigers Press Office, Tigers Webmaster

Blob
Top Cat
Top Cat
Posts: 99
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 9:46 am
Location: Leicester

Post by Blob »

I would at least hope to believe that, but if it comes out that he once did "do" drugs, than i will lose all hope for cyclists.

In related type topic, Justin "Good Boy" Gatlin has now also revealed he took performance enhancing drugs. As a few years ago he apparently slated all athletes who took drugs, this is just another nail in the coffin for athletics.
westwinds31
Super User
Super User
Posts: 6007
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 9:26 am

Post by westwinds31 »

Hey.....Armstrong is a legend....I just think that the sport of cycling has been riddled with drugs for years. I've read Armstrongs 'Not about the bike' book which is superb....it just opens the whole debate about who is clean and who isn't ....as in athletics.....in the back of your mind will always be that question....
Jess
Super User
Super User
Posts: 2675
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 8:55 pm
Location: On a hill in the middle of nowhere

Post by Jess »

I'm sure that if Lance was guilty he would have been found out. Surely over the years that he won he would have had at least one drugs test that would have confirmed anything that might have been enhancing his performance.

it now seems that Justin Gaitlin also tested positive for testosterone earlier this year, and faces a life ban. what on earth is sport coming to......
Donncha O'Callaghan and Bruce Reihana are the best players that ever lived. Don't even bother to argue with me.

And - however good Imanol Harinordoquy is, he is still an idiot
dailywaffle
Super User
Super User
Posts: 7106
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: NW Leics

Post by dailywaffle »

Nothing was ever proven against Lance, but he never received the credit he probably deserved back in the USA due to the allegations made against him some years back.

We have almost come to the point where athletes are presumed guilty until proven innocent, which is why I pretty much only follow team sports now (I would rather not support just the one pharmaceutical company !).
IsraeliTiger
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1455
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Currently Haifa, Israel. Formerly Oadby, England.

Post by IsraeliTiger »

Wow.... a lifetime ban for Gatlin seems to be on the horizon. Thats a serious shock to the athletics world.
Kinoulton wrote:Surely that's much more in depth than your average corporate box punter can tolerate. How about "If the entire crowd shut up, you shut up. Otherwise we'll close your bar."
dailywaffle
Super User
Super User
Posts: 7106
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: NW Leics

Post by dailywaffle »

That's right - he failed a test some years back, but was given a 'second chance'. And this is how he pays everyone back.

I think Ben Johnson recently said that sponsors and fans, ultimately, are more interested in medals and records than whether or not an athlete is 'clean'. As a result, plenty of athletes will continue to cheat and we had better just get used to it.

Which is why I have lost all interest in athletics.
Blob
Top Cat
Top Cat
Posts: 99
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 9:46 am
Location: Leicester

Post by Blob »

Yeh, but you also need to realise that the last time he failed a durgss test that was apparently because of the medicine he was taking for his Attention Disoder or something similar. His team hadnt realised that they would need to tell the athletics board about it :?
WharfedaleTiger
Super User
Super User
Posts: 2874
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 9:17 pm
Location: In my small, hermate like room in a hon the edge of a cliff perched on top of a hill above Kinsley.

Post by WharfedaleTiger »

WHO??!?!?!
www.Rugbyrebels.com
There is more to life then porn. For instance, there's, um...there's, er...Well, there's alcohol
Comfort the Disturbed. Disturb the Comfortable.
God is my co-pilot, but the Devil is my bombardier.
Blob
Top Cat
Top Cat
Posts: 99
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 9:46 am
Location: Leicester

Post by Blob »

Who do you mean?

Llody Flandis or whatever his name is is a cyclist who came first on the final day of the Tour de France, after performing awfully the day before...

Justin Gatlin is the world champion and olympic gold medallist, and holds the world 100m sprint record with Asafa Powell at 9.77 seconds. He has recently been pulling up in a lot of races, which is apparently because he didnt want to perform hen he was "drugged up"...
WharfedaleTiger
Super User
Super User
Posts: 2874
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 9:17 pm
Location: In my small, hermate like room in a hon the edge of a cliff perched on top of a hill above Kinsley.

Post by WharfedaleTiger »

I was talking about the 1st one.
www.Rugbyrebels.com
There is more to life then porn. For instance, there's, um...there's, er...Well, there's alcohol
Comfort the Disturbed. Disturb the Comfortable.
God is my co-pilot, but the Devil is my bombardier.
dailywaffle
Super User
Super User
Posts: 7106
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: NW Leics

Post by dailywaffle »

Blob wrote:Yeh, but you also need to realise that the last time he failed a durgss test that was apparently because of the medicine he was taking for his Attention Disoder or something similar. His team hadnt realised that they would need to tell the athletics board about it :?
Hi Blob

But, to quote (summary) from the IAAF Council:

"Gatlin had commited a doping offence, and any repetition would result in a life ban" ..... "The IAAF will not grant exemptions to athletes with ADD who wish to use amphetamines".

Under the strict liability rules that govern the sport he had cheated (the first time) and, arguably, was fortunate to be dealt with leniently. One can argue whether the rules are 'fair' or not, but I stand by my comment about how he pays everyone back.
mrsmoody
Super User
Super User
Posts: 4783
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 8:57 pm
Location: east sussex nr tunbridge wells

Post by mrsmoody »

yeah but we cant lose gaitland he's too good!
Kellogs frosties, brings out the tiger in you!

http://Hannah-Fantastic.bebo.com
Blob
Top Cat
Top Cat
Posts: 99
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 9:46 am
Location: Leicester

Post by Blob »

I'm not arguing it, if the drugs test are true, he deserves to be banned for life. The Athletics board need to show 0% tolerance of drugs if they are to regain a slim control of the almost unstoppable downwards spiral to drugs and no ppublic support.

However, to possibly combat this epidemic, how about a vast overhaul of the way sport is run? How about a drugs olympic-so comptitors can take drugs, but they will be monitored by the Athletics board and so it would be sfer than taking them on their own, and then having a non-drugs olympic. Perhaps the penalty for takingdrugs in the non-drugs olympics could be public flogging and 5 months work in a inner-city drugs rehabilitation unit? :twisted:
dailywaffle
Super User
Super User
Posts: 7106
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: NW Leics

Post by dailywaffle »

Hi Blob

Yes, some commentators have talked about a monitored sport where drugs are allowed, but (not surprisingly) everyone has balked at the concept. But given the public perception that some sports are so tainted (cycling and athletics being examples) maybe that is the future ? Maybe Ben Johnson is right after all, ultimately we care more about performance than ethics ?

Or maybe individual sports will lose all mass appeal, becoming minority interests only. I heard that interest in the Tour this year was way down, which will surely have a negative impact on future sponsorship etc. I don't know the answer, but some sports in the future may end up being viewed in the same way as we view the 'sport' of bodybuilding today. :(
IsraeliTiger
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1455
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Currently Haifa, Israel. Formerly Oadby, England.

Post by IsraeliTiger »

Of course interest in the Tour was down. People wanted to watch Lance Armstrong. Its like the way people only watch MotoGP for Valentino Rossi, or a few years back, F1 for Michael Schumacher.
Kinoulton wrote:Surely that's much more in depth than your average corporate box punter can tolerate. How about "If the entire crowd shut up, you shut up. Otherwise we'll close your bar."
Post Reply