BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)

Forum to discuss everything that is Tigers related

Moderators: Tigerbeat, Rizzo, Tigers Press Office, Tigers Webmaster

Post Reply
Dokie
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 947
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2020 9:25 am

Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)

Post by Dokie »

FrontRowUnionMember wrote: Sat Feb 27, 2021 5:41 pm I agree Cole looks better as a starter, but I wonder if there is a reluctance to have both Heyes and Whitcombe on the bench and finishing together meaning we lack experience, so one has to start, and Heyes is more ready.
I like the look of Porter, I’d be having him and Van Wyk on the wings until Nadolo is back, Steward at 15, and Murimurivalu as the utility option in 23 shirt.
Prefer to see Porter at 12. It suits his skill set. He’s not strong enough in the air to play wing unless, like Bristol, the opposition don’t kick the ball much.
TigerFeetSteve
Super User
Super User
Posts: 7562
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 6:23 am

Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)

Post by TigerFeetSteve »

TigerBoy1880 wrote: Sat Feb 27, 2021 6:52 pm
sapajo wrote: Sat Feb 27, 2021 6:45 pm
CrumblingTerrace wrote: Sat Feb 27, 2021 6:25 pm This new game plan is making us much more competitive. We're not getting hammered.

But we're going to have to develop our attacking game to start winning matches like this. Teams who can score lots of tries will keep getting too far ahead.
Its all about winning sick to death of losing and not being hammered is no consolation.
Exeter, second in the league have lost 4 games.
As have Sale, Quins and Saints. Falcons and Irish have lost 5 and Wasps, 6. Tigers have lost 6.
1 of thoses losses was due to a Covid cancellation too.
Used to run around with an 11, 14 or 15 on my back.
sam16111986
Super User
Super User
Posts: 7162
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:27 pm
Location: Shepshed

Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)

Post by sam16111986 »

Wayne Richardson Fan Club wrote: Sat Feb 27, 2021 5:12 pm 12 is a real issue for us, Porter deserves a run there, Moroni probably deserved a yellow but for the first one.
Chessum played well but he certainly isn't an 8, but worthy of starting at 6 next week.
To be fair to Chessum he controlled the ball well at the back of the scrum. There were some messy scrums in that game and he never lost control. You'd normally want to have your 8 to carry more in the loose as you say but if someone like Brink was at 6 then it could work.

Porter at 12 and Moroni at 13? I'd like to see that given a go.
Dangerous4
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1359
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2018 5:15 pm
Location: High Wycombe, Bucks.

Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)

Post by Dangerous4 »

Number 12 birth needs attention, and other personnel will need replacing in key positions.

Looking back to where we were this time last year, we have most certainly progressed. I envisage us to be challenging seriously in another two or three seasons.It takes time to work from the bottom to the top, and S B has worked wonders since replacing G M. He appears to have a long term plan, something that has been absent for some time now. All in all I feel pretty confident about the future.
Redstripeman
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 151
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2017 11:04 pm

Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)

Post by Redstripeman »

OakhamTiger32 wrote: Sat Feb 27, 2021 7:01 pm
TigerBoy1880 wrote: Sat Feb 27, 2021 6:52 pm
sapajo wrote: Sat Feb 27, 2021 6:45 pm

Its all about winning sick to death of losing and not being hammered is no consolation.
Exeter, second in the league have lost 4 games.
As have Sale, Quins and Saints. Falcons and Irish have lost 5 and Wasps, 6. Tigers have lost 6.
That’s a crazy stat! Doesn’t feel like it but shows that everyone is dropping points. And we are still a way ahead of bottom placed Gloucester!
....this rugby season is mirroring the football season!!!
All very weird and potentially open to an unexpected team to come through and surprise us all.
TigerBoy1880
Silver Member
Silver Member
Posts: 638
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2019 10:04 pm

Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)

Post by TigerBoy1880 »

Redstripeman wrote: Sat Feb 27, 2021 9:19 pm
OakhamTiger32 wrote: Sat Feb 27, 2021 7:01 pm
TigerBoy1880 wrote: Sat Feb 27, 2021 6:52 pm

Exeter, second in the league have lost 4 games.
As have Sale, Quins and Saints. Falcons and Irish have lost 5 and Wasps, 6. Tigers have lost 6.
That’s a crazy stat! Doesn’t feel like it but shows that everyone is dropping points. And we are still a way ahead of bottom placed Gloucester!
....this rugby season is mirroring the football season!!!
All very weird and potentially open to an unexpected team to come through and surprise us all.
What like Man City?🤔
JP14
Super User
Super User
Posts: 7484
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2017 7:37 am

Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)

Post by JP14 »

RagingBull wrote: Sat Feb 27, 2021 3:28 pm Wouldn't everyone love to have match winners as 2nd choices...

Porter certainly could IMO develop into extremely dangerous crash ball centre
He’s very Jamie Roberts esq in my opinion.
Formerly of Burbaaage (not Inkleh), now up north at uni
iceman_19
Silver Member
Silver Member
Posts: 734
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:52 pm
Location: Bristol

Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)

Post by iceman_19 »

Porter, yet again today, showed himself to be a very fine all round player. He is very physical, has a good all round skill set, and you can hear him talking all the time. For me he needs a run at 12 with Moroni and a first choice pack, and I genuinely think we may have unearthed a gem.

Other than that, great scramble defence and last 20 - we were far too static and predictable in the first hour. Reffell and Moroni were awesome, Chessum showed up well out of position too. Lots of reasons to be positive - restricting probably one of the best attacking sides in Europe to two tries (and those only scored against 14 men) was good to see.
Tigers till I die

www.ruckedover.blogspot.com
kk20gb30
Super User
Super User
Posts: 2897
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2017 1:01 pm
Location: Over The Hills & Far Away

Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)

Post by kk20gb30 »

A lot of effort for little tangible reward - we were worth more than the points acquired.Still, much to take from the game.
Seemingly heading rapidly toward senility .....Not long or far to go now , in fact, getting worse daily.....
wellstiger
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 896
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 10:56 am

Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)

Post by wellstiger »

Are we the finished article? No.
Are we improving as a team? Is the 80 min performance improving? Is the defensive effort improving? Are we performing better than this time last season? For me Yes Yes Yes.

Both teams yesterday were missing players and both teams put in a shift with fringe players. The difference for me was the energy in what we were about. Bristol scrum was until yesterday presumed to be the best in the prem. So for me we had them on toast.
In time I see a more attacking regime being introduced. We were hitting brick walls yesterday with no idea how to break it down.
SB has been rotating the squad game on game due to injuries and International duties and there was little drop in intensity.

Stick with it boys and girls (and others), the future looks brighter. I know some want win after win and nothing else will do.
We were starting from point zero. So a big well done boys for all the effort.
MCC1964
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 912
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 4:29 pm
Location: East Midlands

Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)

Post by MCC1964 »

And I’m going to say it.....congrats to Mike Ford. Whilst no team can prevent all scores I think we are becoming much harder to score against......when we have 15 men in the pitch. Certainly compared to last year. So credit where credit is due.

What I want to see more signs of is our attacking shape, but generally and compared to last year I can only see positives moving forward or at least I genuinely feel we are heading in the right direction. I am as impatient as anyone else in terms of wanting us to be a more dominating team in both attack and defence, but I like the squad that is building.
jgriffin
Super User
Super User
Posts: 8093
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 5:49 pm
Location: On the edge of oblivion

Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)

Post by jgriffin »

SB said as much in his interview - great defence, need to sort the attack out.
For me a massive improvement and a real feel of evolution PLUS how good are our homegrown players! :smt026
Leicester Tigers 1995-
Nottingham 1995-2000
Swansea (Whites) 1988-95
A game played on grass in the open air by teams of XV.
sam16111986
Super User
Super User
Posts: 7162
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:27 pm
Location: Shepshed

Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)

Post by sam16111986 »

jgriffin wrote: Sun Feb 28, 2021 1:36 pm SB said as much in his interview - great defence, need to sort the attack out.
For me a massive improvement and a real feel of evolution PLUS how good are our homegrown players! :smt026
The younger lads coming through the development team (and Porter) were really good. Some massive positives there, 12 months ago that game falls apart with the yellow card but second half we were brilliant and in fact had the better chances.

Tactics were good and put us in really good positions but we looked a bit clueless when the rolling maul wasn't yielding tries. We tried the scrum route and bulldozing our way over but it was all a bit obvious. The platform is in place now is the time that the attacking shape come under scrutiny because there was at least one league point left at Bristol that should have come back to WR and possibly more. More variation, more lines of attack are required it's ok saying if Ford was available but we know he will be with England for a third of every season because of his qualities. We've got to have an attack that isn't reliant on him.
MurphysLaw
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1945
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 2:14 pm
Location: Oundle

Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)

Post by MurphysLaw »

[quote=sam16111986 post_id=769617 time=1614520338 user_id=6978]
[quote=jgriffin post_id=769613 time=1614519362 user_id=9496]
SB said as much in his interview - great defence, need to sort the attack out.
For me a massive improvement and a real feel of evolution PLUS how good are our homegrown players! :smt026
[/quote]

The younger lads coming through the development team (and Porter) were really good. Some massive positives there, 12 months ago that game falls apart with the yellow card but second half we were brilliant and in fact had the better chances.

Tactics were good and put us in really good positions but we looked a bit clueless when the rolling maul wasn't yielding tries. We tried the scrum route and bulldozing our way over but it was all a bit obvious. The platform is in place now is the time that the attacking shape come under scrutiny because there was at least one league point left at Bristol that should have come back to WR and possibly more. More variation, more lines of attack are required it's ok saying if Ford was available but we know he will be with England for a third of every season because of his qualities. We've got to have an attack that isn't reliant on him.
[/quote]

Yes, this has to right!
It doesn't take much for opposing teams to see where Tigers have been focusing their try-scoring efforts recently, and Bris managed to nullify the catch and drive. Beyond that Tigers offered little threat.
teds
Silver Member
Silver Member
Posts: 670
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 6:02 pm
Location: london

Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)

Post by teds »

RagingBull wrote: Sat Feb 27, 2021 2:59 pm
LE18 wrote: Sat Feb 27, 2021 2:58 pm
RagingBull wrote: Sat Feb 27, 2021 2:56 pm

He looks good as a winger.
even better as a SH
not in his last game as one.
Sorry RB, I can’t remember Simmonds last game as scrum half, could you remind me what happened?
Post Reply