BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)
Moderators: Tigerbeat, Rizzo, Tigers Press Office, Tigers Webmaster
-
- Super User
- Posts: 3876
- Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 11:53 am
- Location: The Salt Mines
Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)
If Tomas is fit, it will be Wells at 6..shouldn't be, but it will be, it should be either Smith or Lewis, really prefer us playing back rowers in the back row, preferably in their best position.
Van Wyk was injury sub, so who knows, wouldn't risk Nemani unless he is 100%, Kelly looks really sharp off the bench, keep Moroni at 13 he looks a real threat there both on attack & defense.
Van Wyk was injury sub, so who knows, wouldn't risk Nemani unless he is 100%, Kelly looks really sharp off the bench, keep Moroni at 13 he looks a real threat there both on attack & defense.
To win is not as important as playing with style!
-
- Super User
- Posts: 4993
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:19 pm
- Location: Thurnby Lodge
Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)
Moroni moved to the wing when Kelly came onWayne Richardson Fan Club wrote: ↑Sat Feb 20, 2021 8:54 pm If Tomas is fit, it will be Wells at 6..shouldn't be, but it will be, it should be either Smith or Lewis, really prefer us playing back rowers in the back row, preferably in their best position.
Van Wyk was injury sub, so who knows, wouldn't risk Nemani unless he is 100%, Kelly looks really sharp off the bench, keep Moroni at 13 he looks a real threat there both on attack & defense.
-
- Super User
- Posts: 7546
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 6:23 am
Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)
I thought Kelly played on the wing, last week Kelly came on the wing and Moroni moved to centre.Jimmy Skitz wrote: ↑Sat Feb 20, 2021 8:59 pmMoroni moved to the wing when Kelly came onWayne Richardson Fan Club wrote: ↑Sat Feb 20, 2021 8:54 pm If Tomas is fit, it will be Wells at 6..shouldn't be, but it will be, it should be either Smith or Lewis, really prefer us playing back rowers in the back row, preferably in their best position.
Van Wyk was injury sub, so who knows, wouldn't risk Nemani unless he is 100%, Kelly looks really sharp off the bench, keep Moroni at 13 he looks a real threat there both on attack & defense.
Used to run around with an 11, 14 or 15 on my back.
-
- Super User
- Posts: 4993
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:19 pm
- Location: Thurnby Lodge
Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)
last week maybe but Moroni was definitely playing left wing second half and Kelly in the centres where he put that kick in to the try lineTigerFeetSteve wrote: ↑Sat Feb 20, 2021 9:07 pmI thought Kelly played on the wing, last week Kelly came on the wing and Moroni moved to centre.Jimmy Skitz wrote: ↑Sat Feb 20, 2021 8:59 pmMoroni moved to the wing when Kelly came onWayne Richardson Fan Club wrote: ↑Sat Feb 20, 2021 8:54 pm If Tomas is fit, it will be Wells at 6..shouldn't be, but it will be, it should be either Smith or Lewis, really prefer us playing back rowers in the back row, preferably in their best position.
Van Wyk was injury sub, so who knows, wouldn't risk Nemani unless he is 100%, Kelly looks really sharp off the bench, keep Moroni at 13 he looks a real threat there both on attack & defense.
-
- Super User
- Posts: 3876
- Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 11:53 am
- Location: The Salt Mines
Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)
I wasn't advocating Kelly on the wing, another example of square pegs in round holes..after he came on today it was difficult to work out what was going on, game was all over the place, he definitely went to 14 last week.Jimmy Skitz wrote: ↑Sat Feb 20, 2021 8:59 pmMoroni moved to the wing when Kelly came onWayne Richardson Fan Club wrote: ↑Sat Feb 20, 2021 8:54 pm If Tomas is fit, it will be Wells at 6..shouldn't be, but it will be, it should be either Smith or Lewis, really prefer us playing back rowers in the back row, preferably in their best position.
Van Wyk was injury sub, so who knows, wouldn't risk Nemani unless he is 100%, Kelly looks really sharp off the bench, keep Moroni at 13 he looks a real threat there both on attack & defense.
I hope the OTY clear out doesn't get looked at again as it looked iffy & whatever the Pests were on about in the 1st half all of a sudden gets found.
Last edited by Wayne Richardson Fan Club on Sun Feb 21, 2021 7:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
To win is not as important as playing with style!
-
- Super User
- Posts: 8346
- Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 8:46 pm
- Location: Scotland
Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)
I would not be surprised to see some rotation for this game away from home against the current leaders.
"If you want entertainment, go to the theatre," says Edinburgh head coach Richard Cockerill. "Rugby players play the game to win.15/1/21.
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 1173
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2020 6:36 pm
Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)
I can almost see Bonilla being given a shot at Bristol with Moroni or Montoya being rested.
Maybe Montoya as Youngs and Clare/Kerr could get some game time. Not sure how I’d feel about it but can almost see it being a possibility.
Maybe Montoya as Youngs and Clare/Kerr could get some game time. Not sure how I’d feel about it but can almost see it being a possibility.
Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)
Absolutely nothing to lose in this game as obviously Bristol will be strong favs but we are building slowly and with a fair wind and all that.
Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)
The battle of the set-piece will be one to look out for in my opinion, both Tigers and Brizzle have been scoring tries aplenty from the rolling maul.
Formerly of Burbaaage (not Inkleh), now up north at uni
Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)
1. de Bruin
2. Montoya
3. Cole
4. Green
5. Lavanini
6. Chessum
7. Reffell
8. Brink
9. Wigglesworth (c)
10. Henry
11. Murimurivalu
12. Scott
13. Moroni
14. van Wyk
15. Steward
16. Youngs
17. Leatigaga
18. Heyes
19. Henderson
20. Wallace
21. JVP
22. McPhilips
23. Porter
2. Montoya
3. Cole
4. Green
5. Lavanini
6. Chessum
7. Reffell
8. Brink
9. Wigglesworth (c)
10. Henry
11. Murimurivalu
12. Scott
13. Moroni
14. van Wyk
15. Steward
16. Youngs
17. Leatigaga
18. Heyes
19. Henderson
20. Wallace
21. JVP
22. McPhilips
23. Porter
Formerly of Burbaaage (not Inkleh), now up north at uni
-
- Super User
- Posts: 7546
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 6:23 am
Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)
Pretty much how I'd line up, dependent on Van Wyk and Wigglesworth who both could have picked up knocks yesterday (which was for both their first game back after an injury the week before) also depends on Nadolo returning to fitness.JP14 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 21, 2021 10:27 am 1. de Bruin
2. Montoya
3. Cole
4. Green
5. Lavanini
6. Chessum
7. Reffell
8. Brink
9. Wigglesworth (c)
10. Henry
11. Murimurivalu
12. Scott
13. Moroni
14. van Wyk
15. Steward
16. Youngs
17. Leatigaga
18. Heyes
19. Henderson
20. Wallace
21. JVP
22. McPhilips
23. Porter
Used to run around with an 11, 14 or 15 on my back.
Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)
Based on selection vs. Quins I wonder if we may see a few more players "rested" or "rotated" this week?
I would certainly be in favour of seeing 3 or 4 players miss one game rather than 15 changes and a drubbing. Presuming Wigglesworth and Wiese missed the game vs. Quins due to "rotation" rather than short-term injuries then perhaps Steward, Moroni, Scott and Henry could miss out this week. If that is SB's plan, then I certainly prefer it to the "15 changes and get battered by 40 points" approach we have seen in the past. I don't mention any of the front rowers or Lavanini for rotation as they are often playing only 45-50 mins per week but I would like to see some further rotation with the starting front row. This would allow for the strongest available XV to play vs. Irish (H) and Gloucester (A) which are two games we really need to target.
My side would be:
Leatigaga, Youngs, Cole
Lavanini, Green
Wells, Brink, Reffell
Wigglesworth, Bonilla
Kelly, Taute
Porter/ Potter, Murimurivalu, Van Wyk
Montoya, De Bruin, Heyes, Henderson, Wallace, JVP, McPhillips, Porter/ Potter
I would certainly be in favour of seeing 3 or 4 players miss one game rather than 15 changes and a drubbing. Presuming Wigglesworth and Wiese missed the game vs. Quins due to "rotation" rather than short-term injuries then perhaps Steward, Moroni, Scott and Henry could miss out this week. If that is SB's plan, then I certainly prefer it to the "15 changes and get battered by 40 points" approach we have seen in the past. I don't mention any of the front rowers or Lavanini for rotation as they are often playing only 45-50 mins per week but I would like to see some further rotation with the starting front row. This would allow for the strongest available XV to play vs. Irish (H) and Gloucester (A) which are two games we really need to target.
My side would be:
Leatigaga, Youngs, Cole
Lavanini, Green
Wells, Brink, Reffell
Wigglesworth, Bonilla
Kelly, Taute
Porter/ Potter, Murimurivalu, Van Wyk
Montoya, De Bruin, Heyes, Henderson, Wallace, JVP, McPhillips, Porter/ Potter
Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)
This is an interesting one. Realistically we're losing two of our three biggest ball carriers and we need to make up for that somehow. We're also playing one of the fastest teams in the league. So I think bringing in Nephi and Heyes makes a lot of sense. I do think our maul will suffer as a result. I'd like to see Wallace start but with his lack of game time I'd play him off the bench.
I think I would go with the below (not the same as what I think SB will do - which is play Wells)
1. Leatigaga
2. Montoya
3. Heyes
4. Lavanini
5. Green
6. Henderson
7. Reffell
8. Brink
9. Wigglesworth
10. Henry
11. Murimurivalu
12. Scott
13. Moroni
14. van Wyk
15. Steward
16. Youngs
17. De Bruin
18. Cole
19. Wells
20. Wallace
21. JVP
22. McPhilips
23. Kelly
I think I would go with the below (not the same as what I think SB will do - which is play Wells)
1. Leatigaga
2. Montoya
3. Heyes
4. Lavanini
5. Green
6. Henderson
7. Reffell
8. Brink
9. Wigglesworth
10. Henry
11. Murimurivalu
12. Scott
13. Moroni
14. van Wyk
15. Steward
16. Youngs
17. De Bruin
18. Cole
19. Wells
20. Wallace
21. JVP
22. McPhilips
23. Kelly
Never believe generalisations
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 272
- Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2018 10:53 am
Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)
Given the Iondon Irish scrum winning a few penalties today vs Bristol, that may be quite an interesting facet of next weekends game
-
- Super User
- Posts: 7154
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:27 pm
- Location: Shepshed
Re: BRISTOL vs TIGERS - Sat 27 Feb 21 (1300)
Bristol faded badly Vs LI who clearly saved some big name players foreseeing this. I'd be tempted to pack the bench with impact and then look to scrum and maul their forwards into the floor in the first half. Internationals next week so no Sheedy as well.
Second half bring on ball carriers like Leatigaga and Henderson to hopefully expose the same fatigue, high energy Luke Wallace off the bench won't hurt either.. I'm not sure we can go toe to toe with them in a quick game. Wasps have a rapid team but some forwards missing similar to Bristol and our tactics from yesterday were really good. Encore except with better discipline.