Tigers vs Worcester - Sat 06 Feb 1500
Moderators: Tigerbeat, Rizzo, Tigers Press Office, Tigers Webmaster
Re: Tigers vs Worcester - Sat 06 Feb 1500
Think that was worth a 2nd look tbf!
-
- Super User
- Posts: 4822
- Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2019 1:01 pm
Re: Tigers vs Worcester - Sat 06 Feb 1500
I get it’s a shot to nothing with the penalty coming but that really frustrates me. We are going through the phases making good ground and getting over the gainline.. ref says advantage and we decide to kick it straight away.. why not try another few phases!
Oakham lad born and bred, Tigers season ticket holder who is enjoying steady progression back towards the good old days!
-
- Silver Member
- Posts: 638
- Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2019 10:04 pm
Re: Tigers vs Worcester - Sat 06 Feb 1500
Well we almost scored!OakhamTiger32 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 06, 2021 3:10 pm I get it’s a shot to nothing with the penalty coming but that really frustrates me. We are going through the phases making good ground and getting over the gainline.. ref says advantage and we decide to kick it straight away.. why not try another few phases!
-
- Super User
- Posts: 4988
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:19 pm
- Location: Thurnby Lodge
Re: Tigers vs Worcester - Sat 06 Feb 1500
because if Nadolo doesn't pull his hamstring he catches that and scores the tryOakhamTiger32 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 06, 2021 3:10 pm I get it’s a shot to nothing with the penalty coming but that really frustrates me. We are going through the phases making good ground and getting over the gainline.. ref says advantage and we decide to kick it straight away.. why not try another few phases!
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 1132
- Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 9:18 am
- Location: Over the hill and far away
Re: Tigers vs Worcester - Sat 06 Feb 1500
Nadolo was ‘accidentally’ tripped cf David Luiz. The trip may have caused the hamstring to go.
Last edited by Grimlish on Sat Feb 06, 2021 3:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Super User
- Posts: 13364
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 12:54 pm
Re: Tigers vs Worcester - Sat 06 Feb 1500
IMO that was a good kick.
Actually had space there.
Actually had space there.
-
- Super User
- Posts: 4822
- Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2019 1:01 pm
Re: Tigers vs Worcester - Sat 06 Feb 1500
We didn’t score and now we’ve lost a player. We were looking very dangerous attacking and making ground.. but yes.. we score and everyone says great idea so fair enoughTigerBoy1880 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 06, 2021 3:11 pmWell we almost scored!OakhamTiger32 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 06, 2021 3:10 pm I get it’s a shot to nothing with the penalty coming but that really frustrates me. We are going through the phases making good ground and getting over the gainline.. ref says advantage and we decide to kick it straight away.. why not try another few phases!
Oakham lad born and bred, Tigers season ticket holder who is enjoying steady progression back towards the good old days!
-
- Super User
- Posts: 13364
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 12:54 pm
Re: Tigers vs Worcester - Sat 06 Feb 1500
Tigers need to protect the ruck more cause the ref isn't paying any attention to it.
Re: Tigers vs Worcester - Sat 06 Feb 1500
How’s that not a penalty on WW? Awful reffing!
"Rugby isn't a contact sport,ballroom dancing is a contact sport. Rugby is a collision sport" Heyneke Meyer
-
- Super User
- Posts: 4988
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:19 pm
- Location: Thurnby Lodge
Re: Tigers vs Worcester - Sat 06 Feb 1500
their player with the most clear case of playing the 9 you will ever see and Sir ignores it then they get a penalty the next ruck.
More to the point as Captain WW should have had a word their players clearly knew what he was doing
More to the point as Captain WW should have had a word their players clearly knew what he was doing
Last edited by Jimmy Skitz on Sat Feb 06, 2021 3:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Silver Member
- Posts: 638
- Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2019 10:04 pm
Re: Tigers vs Worcester - Sat 06 Feb 1500
We could have lost a player to injury by going through the phases. Exactly, had we scored, we all would have said great try.OakhamTiger32 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 06, 2021 3:12 pmWe didn’t score and now we’ve lost a player. We were looking very dangerous attacking and making ground.. but yes.. we score and everyone says great idea so fair enoughTigerBoy1880 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 06, 2021 3:11 pmWell we almost scored!OakhamTiger32 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 06, 2021 3:10 pm I get it’s a shot to nothing with the penalty coming but that really frustrates me. We are going through the phases making good ground and getting over the gainline.. ref says advantage and we decide to kick it straight away.. why not try another few phases!
Re: Tigers vs Worcester - Sat 06 Feb 1500
So they can just take Wigglesworth out off the ball then ?
Re: Tigers vs Worcester - Sat 06 Feb 1500
Good work Muri,would’ve been a travesty if they scored a try from that shocking reffing!
"Rugby isn't a contact sport,ballroom dancing is a contact sport. Rugby is a collision sport" Heyneke Meyer
Re: Tigers vs Worcester - Sat 06 Feb 1500
Awful wasn’t it mate!
"Rugby isn't a contact sport,ballroom dancing is a contact sport. Rugby is a collision sport" Heyneke Meyer
Re: Tigers vs Worcester - Sat 06 Feb 1500
Terrible play!
"Rugby isn't a contact sport,ballroom dancing is a contact sport. Rugby is a collision sport" Heyneke Meyer