Sam Simmonds?!
Moderators: Tigerbeat, Rizzo, Tigers Press Office, Tigers Webmaster
Sam Simmonds?!
Can anyone explain why this chap isn’t the first name on the England team sheet for Jones, proven leader, consistent quality performances, scores tries, proven in all aspects, yes England have an awesome back row but he most slot in somewhere, bench spot at least!!??
Re: Sam Simmonds?!
Because he is a luxury player. That’s no disrespect to his work rate or talent but the premiership is a big step down from international rugby. As an example using the Ireland game from the Autumn cup,would you have wanted Sam in there or Billy V? It was brutal,no room for luxury players. Of course he is a better player now but he didnt stand out at all in his international appearances and he just doesn’t fit into Eddies gameplan I’m afraid.
"Rugby isn't a contact sport,ballroom dancing is a contact sport. Rugby is a collision sport" Heyneke Meyer
Re: Sam Simmonds?!
Just to add,a lot of people were on Billy V but he was fantastic this autumn. I believe he was top tackler and carrier and some of his tackles were brutal. Right back to his best and a world class player in arguably the worlds best back row and with Earle providing fantastic cameos every game we are ok without Sam.
"Rugby isn't a contact sport,ballroom dancing is a contact sport. Rugby is a collision sport" Heyneke Meyer
Re: Sam Simmonds?!
Because England are obsessed with running the ball into contact for fear of what might happen if they try to evade it.baz1664 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 31, 2020 6:50 pm Can anyone explain why this chap isn’t the first name on the England team sheet for Jones, proven leader, consistent quality performances, scores tries, proven in all aspects, yes England have an awesome back row but he most slot in somewhere, bench spot at least!!??
Unfortunately there are some idiots about who view backrow players who possess line breaking ability as luxury players.
If Simmonds were from New Zealand those same idiots would probably be raving about him.
Re: Sam Simmonds?!
Not even a bench impact player? Gets the best player in euro vote and doesn’t get a sniff, just very odd!! Surely pick on form!!
Re: Sam Simmonds?!
Less of the idiot lippy! He isnt as good as Curry,Underhill or Vunipola simple as! And Earles been fantastic as back up,once you become an international coach and amass a trophy cabinet as big as Eddie has in his time in charge of England get back to me,until then jog on!BFG wrote: ↑Thu Dec 31, 2020 7:29 pmBecause England are obsessed with running the ball into contact for fear of what might happen if they try to evade it.baz1664 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 31, 2020 6:50 pm Can anyone explain why this chap isn’t the first name on the England team sheet for Jones, proven leader, consistent quality performances, scores tries, proven in all aspects, yes England have an awesome back row but he most slot in somewhere, bench spot at least!!??
Unfortunately there are some idiots about who view backrow players who possess line breaking ability as luxury players.
If Simmonds were from New Zealand those same idiots would probably be raving about him.
"Rugby isn't a contact sport,ballroom dancing is a contact sport. Rugby is a collision sport" Heyneke Meyer
Re: Sam Simmonds?!
Who do you drop?
"Rugby isn't a contact sport,ballroom dancing is a contact sport. Rugby is a collision sport" Heyneke Meyer
-
- Super User
- Posts: 6007
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 9:26 am
Re: Sam Simmonds?!
He’s quite clearly behind Curry, Underhill, Vunipola, Earl and Willis for starters. Just because you’re tearing it up at club level doesn’t mean you automatically go straight into the England squad. Eddie likes his way of playing and his type of player...Simmonds isn’t one of those. Other coaches may pick him....it happens. Remember Armand and the clamour to get him into the starting line up ? And Cipriani until recently. Some players just don’t fit the mould.
Re: Sam Simmonds?!
+1westwinds31 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 31, 2020 11:47 pm He’s quite clearly behind Curry, Underhill, Vunipola, Earl and Willis for starters. Just because you’re tearing it up at club level doesn’t mean you automatically go straight into the England squad. Eddie likes his way of playing and his type of player...Simmonds isn’t one of those. Other coaches may pick him....it happens. Remember Armand and the clamour to get him into the starting line up ? And Cipriani until recently. Some players just don’t fit the mould.
"Rugby isn't a contact sport,ballroom dancing is a contact sport. Rugby is a collision sport" Heyneke Meyer
-
- Super User
- Posts: 7513
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 6:23 am
Re: Sam Simmonds?!
Back row is probably England's strongest position atm, I'd rate players in this order for England.
Curry
Underhill
Vunipola
Willis
Simmonds
Earl
Wilson
That's my opinion though 4 to 7 is quite close. Ok Wilson is coming back from injury but performance at international level is proven in his case. EJ has Earl 2spots higher but England have a fantastic backrow. Think Simmonds is unlucky to not have been picked at all yet but given our strength in the position it's not a shocker of a decision.
Curry
Underhill
Vunipola
Willis
Simmonds
Earl
Wilson
That's my opinion though 4 to 7 is quite close. Ok Wilson is coming back from injury but performance at international level is proven in his case. EJ has Earl 2spots higher but England have a fantastic backrow. Think Simmonds is unlucky to not have been picked at all yet but given our strength in the position it's not a shocker of a decision.
Used to run around with an 11, 14 or 15 on my back.
-
- Super User
- Posts: 7112
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:27 pm
- Location: Shepshed
Re: Sam Simmonds?!
I think Eddie has said it before, he like Simmons and thinks he's a great player but balancing the backrow with him in it is difficult. If he plays 8 you need a lock at 6 or some other big bloke because physically Simmons isn't the unit Vunipola or Hughes are. On the flank he isn't up there with the defensive work rate of the kamikaze kids. At Chiefs he tends to play with some pretty massive flankers.
Exeter play a different style of defence to England. They soak up opposition pressure. England go hunting big hits and turnovers. I wish Eddie would find a way to bring him in to the mix as he'd add something in attack but I don't think Eddie is motivated to do so when Ben Earl is scoring plenty of tries in all action displays.
Exeter play a different style of defence to England. They soak up opposition pressure. England go hunting big hits and turnovers. I wish Eddie would find a way to bring him in to the mix as he'd add something in attack but I don't think Eddie is motivated to do so when Ben Earl is scoring plenty of tries in all action displays.
-
- Super User
- Posts: 2005
- Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 4:25 pm
- Location: coalville
Re: Sam Simmonds?!
I have felt for a while that Billy Vunipola has reached his peak and is now not as effective game after game as he used to be. So the time is ripe for a long term replacement to be developed. I'm not convinced by Nathan Hughes. Like his former team mate James Haskell he's great when he's on song but the good performances have been interspersed with mediocre and ineffective ones. Therefore not consistently good enough for me.
For the way England are playing at the moment Curry and Underhill have proved game after game to be the right first choices and therefore difficult to drop unless an experiment with a different style is tried. As others have said whether there is a role for Simmonds depends on that as Ben Earl seems to suit the style currently being utilised.
So for me it's Underhill, Curry and Earl as starters with the finishers slot being a choice between Wilson (my personal choice), Simmonds and Willis. If Alfie Barbeary were fit he might be a wild card choice off the bench at flanker.
For the way England are playing at the moment Curry and Underhill have proved game after game to be the right first choices and therefore difficult to drop unless an experiment with a different style is tried. As others have said whether there is a role for Simmonds depends on that as Ben Earl seems to suit the style currently being utilised.
So for me it's Underhill, Curry and Earl as starters with the finishers slot being a choice between Wilson (my personal choice), Simmonds and Willis. If Alfie Barbeary were fit he might be a wild card choice off the bench at flanker.
Tigers for the premiership and European Cup. Get behind the team and make some noise!!
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 881
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 12:05 pm
Re: Sam Simmonds?!
As it stands now, I’d bet BV would start at 8 for the Lions & I can’t see Eddie dropping him, nor would Ivoice of the crumbie wrote: ↑Fri Jan 01, 2021 9:11 am I have felt for a while that Billy Vunipola has reached his peak and is now not as effective game after game as he used to be. So the time is ripe for a long term replacement to be developed. I'm not convinced by Nathan Hughes. Like his former team mate James Haskell he's great when he's on song but the good performances have been interspersed with mediocre and ineffective ones. Therefore not consistently good enough for me.
For the way England are playing at the moment Curry and Underhill have proved game after game to be the right first choices and therefore difficult to drop unless an experiment with a different style is tried. As others have said whether there is a role for Simmonds depends on that as Ben Earl seems to suit the style currently being utilised.
So for me it's Underhill, Curry and Earl as starters with the finishers slot being a choice between Wilson (my personal choice), Simmonds and Willis. If Alfie Barbeary were fit he might be a wild card choice off the bench at flanker.
I’d have Simmonds instead of Wilson every day of the week
Re: Sam Simmonds?!
I'm not sold on Vunipola being selected for the Lions, however if Faletau stays fit and continues his great form from the Italian game I'm no longer so worried as to who's going to play at the tail in South Africa.
Formerly of Burbaaage (not Inkleh), now up north at uni
Re: Sam Simmonds?!
If Gatland wanted to switch it up and have Stander at 6, with Curry at 7 and Simmonds at 8 for the Lions, that could work but I think you need 3 lineout jumpers against the Boks (but that's just my opinion).
Formerly of Burbaaage (not Inkleh), now up north at uni