2 really entertaining games but one won by 20 points one by 30.
Do posters feel neutral grounds would make the games more of a competition or would the same results have ensued
Are neutral venues required
Moderators: Tigerbeat, Rizzo, Tigers Press Office, Tigers Webmaster
-
cheltexile
- Senior Member
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2015 5:11 pm
- Location: Cheltenham
Re: Are neutral venues required
No, both Exeter and Saracens deserved the home advantage as they finished higher in the league than Gloucester and Saints. The latter two should have been more competitive during the season.
Re: Are neutral venues required
No. The top 2 deserve their home advantage.
The big score gap shows the gap between the quality of the sides. Exeter and Saracens are far ahead of the other 10 teams. Everyone else is at a similar standard.
Re: Are neutral venues required
Not for me...
Formerly of Burbaaage (not Inkleh), now up north at uni
Re: Are neutral venues required
No
Whoever said "one person cannot change the world' never ate undercooked bat
Re: Are neutral venues required
Yes.......why not. If you're going to make a farce out of the league then why not make it a complete farce?
Exile Wigstonite living in Wales.
Poet laureate of the "One Eyed Turk".
Bar stool philosopher in the "Wilted Daffodil"
Poet laureate of the "One Eyed Turk".
Bar stool philosopher in the "Wilted Daffodil"