-119 points difference!!!!
Moderators: Tigerbeat, Rizzo, Tigers Press Office, Tigers Webmaster
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 7:53 am
-
- Super User
- Posts: 6020
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 1:23 am
- Location: Roaming
Re: -119 points difference!!!!
Yes, it's bad.
But do we really need another thread/topic to whine about the state of play?
But do we really need another thread/topic to whine about the state of play?
Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens.
Re: -119 points difference!!!!
Fantastic defensive work
"Rugby isn't a contact sport,ballroom dancing is a contact sport. Rugby is a collision sport" Heyneke Meyer
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 7:53 am
Re: -119 points difference!!!!
I expect *WE* as fans don’t. But what’s the alternative?WhitecapTiger wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2019 5:08 pm Yes, it's bad.
But do we really need another thread/topic to whine about the state of play?
-
- Super User
- Posts: 6020
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 1:23 am
- Location: Roaming
Re: -119 points difference!!!!
Not quite sure why the capitalisation/asterisks to emphasise 'we' (or the possible inference that I may not be a supporter of Tigers ) but, the alternative is quite clearly voicing your point on an existing thread, plenty of them, it's a valid observation, the points difference is atrocious, everyone can see that, the team/club included I'm sure - 'I' (a Tigers supporter) just don't see the need for yet another thread.markharbtiger wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2019 5:15 pmI expect *WE* as fans don’t. But what’s the alternative?WhitecapTiger wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2019 5:08 pm Yes, it's bad.
But do we really need another thread/topic to whine about the state of play?
Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens.
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 7:53 am
Re: -119 points difference!!!!
Apologies, your inference was wrong, and no offence intended. You are part of the ‘we’! I was trying to suggest perhaps too subtly that those with a more formal interest should take particular note...but on reflection, I feel sure they will have.WhitecapTiger wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2019 5:27 pmNot quite sure why the capitalisation/asterisks to emphasise 'we' (or the possible inference that I may not be a supporter of Tigers ) but, the alternative is quite clearly voicing your point on an existing thread, plenty of them, it's a valid observation, the points difference is atrocious, everyone can see that, the team/club included I'm sure - 'I' (a Tigers supporter) just don't see the need for yet another thread.markharbtiger wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2019 5:15 pmI expect *WE* as fans don’t. But what’s the alternative?WhitecapTiger wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2019 5:08 pm Yes, it's bad.
But do we really need another thread/topic to whine about the state of play?
-
- Super User
- Posts: 6020
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 1:23 am
- Location: Roaming
Re: -119 points difference!!!!
No real offence taken mate, maybe I was a bit blunt (has been known) .......apologies. We're on the same page maybe a swarm bombardment is the way ahead after allmarkharbtiger wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2019 5:43 pmApologies, your inference was wrong, and no offence intended. You are part of the ‘we’! I was trying to suggest perhaps too subtly that those with a more formal interest should take particular note...but on reflection, I feel sure they will have.WhitecapTiger wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2019 5:27 pmNot quite sure why the capitalisation/asterisks to emphasise 'we' (or the possible inference that I may not be a supporter of Tigers ) but, the alternative is quite clearly voicing your point on an existing thread, plenty of them, it's a valid observation, the points difference is atrocious, everyone can see that, the team/club included I'm sure - 'I' (a Tigers supporter) just don't see the need for yet another thread.markharbtiger wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2019 5:15 pm
I expect *WE* as fans don’t. But what’s the alternative?
Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens.
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 1359
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2018 5:15 pm
- Location: High Wycombe, Bucks.
Re: -119 points difference!!!!
I certainly have and it doesn't look good.markharbtiger wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2019 5:43 pmApologies, your inference was wrong, and no offence intended. You are part of the ‘we’! I was trying to suggest perhaps too subtly that those with a more formal interest should take particular note...but on reflection, I feel sure they will have.WhitecapTiger wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2019 5:27 pmNot quite sure why the capitalisation/asterisks to emphasise 'we' (or the possible inference that I may not be a supporter of Tigers ) but, the alternative is quite clearly voicing your point on an existing thread, plenty of them, it's a valid observation, the points difference is atrocious, everyone can see that, the team/club included I'm sure - 'I' (a Tigers supporter) just don't see the need for yet another thread.markharbtiger wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2019 5:15 pm
I expect *WE* as fans don’t. But what’s the alternative?
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 1255
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 2:53 am
Re: -119 points difference!!!!
On the plus side it's meant we've been able to watch a lot of tries this season! Not at the right end generally but you can't have everything.
Re: -119 points difference!!!!
People want to be entertained so they should be pleased really!CitizenSmiff wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 10:03 pm On the plus side it's meant we've been able to watch a lot of tries this season! Not at the right end generally but you can't have everything.