Burrell and Tuilagi would be an improvement, at least England would be looking to make effective line breaks with them, but I think Lozowski deserves a proper shot at it.Leicestertinytiger wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 12:35 pmYeah but without someone like that we’re so limited with the backs. Granted Tuilagi would be the ideal crash ball merchant, but will we ever see him in an England shirt again?kpj tiger wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 12:28 pmHe did try Burrell to be fair, he just saw enough after 20 minutes against AustraliaLeicestertinytiger wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 12:07 pm Also think Jones made a massive error in axing Burrell from the squad in favour of Te’o. Whilst he’s not the best player, he’s got international experience and offers something different to the backs we have. A lump who can crash the ball off the 12 channel.
At the moment I can't believe what I am seeing with England replicating Sarries and Exeter, it won't work at international level as top international teams are too good for that, that is why I believe that beyond the bludgeoning of the first 20-30 minutes England often fall away.
Tom Croft used to get stick off fans of other clubs for the type of flanker he was but they completely missed the point, he split the pitch much like the All Blacks often do.
England really need something different.
I'd like to see Paul Hill brought back into the fold as Cole's understudy and see if they can get him developing towards Cole's level at the scrum because he is a good young tight head prop in my opinion.
Also experiment with some other locks and bring in more wide attacking threats on the back row and split that pitch up into attacking channels.
Several of the current forwards although they are good players not enough are bringing an added attacking threat in the channels.
I'm watching players like Curry who are working very hard but offering little else.
It's all left to the backs to produce attacking shapes right in front of teams presently and that's a big ask to keep producing in just one area.