George North RFU report

Forum to discuss everything that is Tigers related

Moderators: Tigerbeat, Rizzo, Tigers Press Office, Tigers Webmaster

fleabane
Super User
Super User
Posts: 5178
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 4:26 pm
Location: Occitanie

George North RFU report

Post by fleabane »

Valhalla I am coming!
watsonjm
Silver Member
Silver Member
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: Cambridge

Re: George North RFU report

Post by watsonjm »

What a joke.

"The CMRG’s view is that there was sufficient evidence to conclude not only from the video evidence but also George North’s history and risk stratification that he should not have returned to the field of play. Northampton Saints medical team has accepted that North may have lost consciousness and therefore should not have returned to play".

That sentence says it all but because North hasn't had any major effects since being knocked out there are no sanctions. What happens they next time they get it wrong and is allowed to play on and then has major effects later? it'll be to little, to late.

Utter shambles by the RFU. Player welfare is important to them my big back side!
jgriffin
Super User
Super User
Posts: 8091
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 5:49 pm
Location: On the edge of oblivion

Re: George North RFU report

Post by jgriffin »

Clear that the Review had no problem in assessing that consciousness likely to have been lost for 5 seconds. Equally clear the medical team should not have accepted his assurance re loss of consciousness (as transient loss is usually forgotten or not registered), and they should've repeated the whole protocol in the dressing room -but they didn't.
What is worse - has North had a full screening with scans? Surely a graduated return now should involve a period of neurological reassessment (I believe O'Driscoll suggested 3 months or even the rest of the season! AFAICR).
Will he admit to further transient issues - even if he is conscious they have occurred? In your early 20s you feel invincible.
Not comfortable with this. If he were my son, I'd want a break for him from rugby while full assessment occurs.
Last edited by jgriffin on Wed Dec 21, 2016 3:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Leicester Tigers 1995-
Nottingham 1995-2000
Swansea (Whites) 1988-95
A game played on grass in the open air by teams of XV.
sapajo
Super User
Super User
Posts: 6157
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 7:48 pm

Re: George North RFU report

Post by sapajo »

Shades of the Salary Cap debacle, let's face fact it was never going to be anything else other than toothless. To me the RFU, Premiership Rugby and the Club's are a self protectionist cartel.
Without hope we are nothing, keep the faith, a Tiger for eternity
jgriffin
Super User
Super User
Posts: 8091
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 5:49 pm
Location: On the edge of oblivion

Re: George North RFU report

Post by jgriffin »

sapajo wrote:Shades of the Salary Cap debacle, let's face fact it was never going to be anything else other than toothless. To me the RFU, Premiership Rugby and the Club's are a self protectionist cartel.
Agree.
Leicester Tigers 1995-
Nottingham 1995-2000
Swansea (Whites) 1988-95
A game played on grass in the open air by teams of XV.
Grimlish
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1132
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 9:18 am
Location: Over the hill and far away

Re: George North RFU report

Post by Grimlish »

sapajo wrote:Shades of the Salary Cap debacle, let's face fact it was never going to be anything else other than toothless. To me the RFU, Premiership Rugby and the Club's are a self protectionist cartel.
It seems that way for sure, but if so it will become an example of short-termist protectionism - as soon as we have a case of negligence brought by a player we'll see where the roulette wheel stops spinning....

To me this smacks of a 'deal' to satisfy the lawyers - Saints catch the blame but no penalty in return for not having to challenge (in the courts?) a likely heavy fine or some other injunction (what other options does the the Premiership have?).

And if I were George North's Dad I'd want to make sure the people assessing him as fit to play this week have absolutely nothing to do with those making decisions at Welford Rd or since for his club.

And Mallinder should be ashamed for his comments.
fortysix
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1443
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 6:22 pm

Re: George North RFU report

Post by fortysix »

Madness, head in the sand mentality..
He has very very serious issues and needs to see a top specialist with full scanning applied.
RFU need shooting.
Cagey Tiger
Super User
Super User
Posts: 2314
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 2:27 pm
Location: South Lincolnshire

Re: George North RFU report

Post by Cagey Tiger »

The expected near "whitewash" as far as the handling of George was concerned. At the age of 60, I won't be around to see if he suffers any long term effects.
tigercaspian
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1282
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 9:56 pm

Re: George North RFU report

Post by tigercaspian »

Most at Saints seem happy with the outcome then, so nothing to see here - move along, move along :-

http://www.rugbynetwork.net/boards/read ... 1,15847762
strawclearer
Super User
Super User
Posts: 4109
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:13 am

Re: George North RFU report

Post by strawclearer »

Cagey Tiger wrote:The expected near "whitewash" as far as the handling of George was concerned. At the age of 60, I won't be around to see if he suffers any long term effects.
Sadly - for him - that may not be the case. Go forward 25 years and I hope you'll be sitting in the Crumbie with a flask of sloe gin reminiscing about the good old days when Tigers won the Eurpean Cup every year from 2016 to 2021. I hope you won't be talking about that Welsh lad who kept getting concussed but wasn't properly looked after - with consequences that affected him in his late 40's.
Happy days clearing straw from the pitch before the Baa-Baas games! KBO
Wear a Mask>Protect The NHS>Save Lives
jgriffin
Super User
Super User
Posts: 8091
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 5:49 pm
Location: On the edge of oblivion

Re: George North RFU report

Post by jgriffin »

http://tinyurl.com/z2ta2qg

Kitson in the Grauniad.
Leicester Tigers 1995-
Nottingham 1995-2000
Swansea (Whites) 1988-95
A game played on grass in the open air by teams of XV.
voice of the crumbie
Super User
Super User
Posts: 2007
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 4:25 pm
Location: coalville

Re: George North RFU report

Post by voice of the crumbie »

In my humble opinion the way to stop this sort of thing happening again is to have all HIA's carried out by independent medics rather than those employed by the clubs thus allowing player welfare (which should always be the overriding concern) to take priority.
Tigers for the premiership and European Cup. Get behind the team and make some noise!!
Rykard
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1438
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 4:05 pm

Re: George North RFU report

Post by Rykard »

jgriffin wrote:http://tinyurl.com/z2ta2qg

Kitson in the Grauniad.
Kitson seems pretty spot on to me.

I thought the stance taken by Ben and flats on rugby tonight was interesting. No sanction is good??, no mention of giving them any suspended sentence even though they were found totally guilty?? bizarre
Last edited by Rykard on Thu Dec 22, 2016 8:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
cheers
Rich
drc_007
Super User
Super User
Posts: 3405
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 9:28 am

Re: George North RFU report

Post by drc_007 »

Have to say I'm not happy with the whole head injury assessment concept.

If you think someone needs a head injury assessment then they should not play in the rest of the match.
Rykard
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1438
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 4:05 pm

Re: George North RFU report

Post by Rykard »

Luke Wallace? said on Rugby tonight that he thought he would have been able to pass the HIA depending on the hit he had taken. Some of the damage only becomes apparent later....
cheers
Rich
Post Reply