Tigers v Treviso Number 8's Crane or Robert Barbieri???

Forum to discuss everything that is Tigers related

Moderators: Tigerbeat, Rizzo, Tigers Press Office, Tigers Webmaster

wormus
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1568
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 8:23 pm
Location: "The Home of the Game!"

Tigers v Treviso Number 8's Crane or Robert Barbieri???

Post by wormus »

Yes we know Crane has not played for a few weeks but tonight he had a terrible game, held up through greed going for a try when there was space outside, a double movement going for a try, many times dropping the ball or just getting in the way.
Many in the Crumbie were shouting to replace him with the better Pearce but tonight ex Tiger Robert Barberieri was a better No.8 than Crane, why did we not send Crane to Treviso as we would surely have scored even more tries.
Sorry Crane time to go back to washing Cars & Coaches despite your chapped hands.
Next week we need McCaffrey and Pearce on the bench. :smt045
Darc Tiger
Super User
Super User
Posts: 7310
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 3:53 pm

Re: Tigers v Treviso Number 8's Crane or Robert Barbieri???

Post by Darc Tiger »

You mean play our 1st and 2nd choice number eight's next week?

You're a genius...
longlivethecrumbie
Super User
Super User
Posts: 2439
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 6:30 pm

Re: Tigers v Treviso Number 8's Crane or Robert Barbieri???

Post by longlivethecrumbie »

wormus wrote:Yes we know Crane has not played for a few weeks but tonight he had a terrible game, held up through greed going for a try when there was space outside, a double movement going for a try, many times dropping the ball or just getting in the way.
Many in the Crumbie were shouting to replace him with the better Pearce but tonight ex Tiger Robert Barberieri was a better No.8 than Crane, why did we not send Crane to Treviso as we would surely have scored even more tries.
Sorry Crane time to go back to washing Cars & Coaches despite your chapped hands.
Next week we need McCaffrey and Pearce on the bench. :smt045
Some of what you say may be correct but a lot about the penalty try was down to Crane. The scrum was static, he shifted to between the 6 and lock and that have our push more momentum. I can't imagine Pearce would have had the nous to do that.

Is next week now a dead rubber so no need to risk any important players (McCaffrey)
Ian Cant
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1930
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 10:51 am

Re: Tigers v Treviso Number 8's Crane or Robert Barbieri???

Post by Ian Cant »

Please get off Crane's back and encourage the team whoever plays.

Points about Crane yesterday:
Gives 100% every game.
Control at the back of the scrum excellent-hence penalty try.
Brilliant organisation of defence-always pointing where the threat was and wasn't to blame for their try.
Dropped the ball twice when held back illegally.
More grunt in our scrum than we have seen for the last few weeks due to correct binding and pushing technique.

Well done Craney and ignore your doubters who despite a fine win against a team we have struggled against in the past still moan! Still that's their right as it is mine to praise all the team last night. :smt038 :smt041
Stu_F
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1896
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 9:01 pm
Location: Enderby

Re: Tigers v Treviso Number 8's Crane or Robert Barbieri???

Post by Stu_F »

Crane is the best at the club (imo) at control at the base of the scrum. And in a tight game when ball retention is important he is also excellent at that, what was the game when he replaced Fonua and made an immediate difference?
Those of us who went to the World Cup matches will recall he was classified by the organisers as a "legend", albeit I went a match in Cardiff where Camacho was likewise classified.
Steve56
Tiger Cub
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 2:27 pm
Location: Cropston

Re: Tigers v Treviso Number 8's Crane or Robert Barbieri???

Post by Steve56 »

I thought he had a very poor game. This was confirmed by my friends in the bar afterwards. He just doesn't suit our new style of play. Sorry, but we've moved on.
tigercaspian
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1282
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 9:56 pm

Re: Tigers v Treviso Number 8's Crane or Robert Barbieri???

Post by tigercaspian »

I don't understand this post? Crane has given years of service to the club and does give that control and grunt at the rear . OK, if yesterday wasn't his finest hour, that's just one game in many.
Barbieri? One season with us, the only highlight of which was his hitch-kick try, and leaves one of Europe's leading teams to join a basement team that's lost umpteen games on the trot.
Even if Old Father Time and new arrivals are catching up with Crane, I hope the club will use him in another capacity , perhaps showing the newbies how to control the ball at the base of the scrum.
And of course showing how to kick in a penalty shoot-out!
fleabane
Super User
Super User
Posts: 5178
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 4:26 pm
Location: Occitanie

Re: Tigers v Treviso Number 8's Crane or Robert Barbieri???

Post by fleabane »

Ian Cant and StuF's opinions sum up Crane for me. Hard working, great technique and never gives up. He is a real Tiger, and to say he doesn't fit, Mr.Steve56, is to fail to understand how a team works.
Valhalla I am coming!
jgriffin
Super User
Super User
Posts: 8093
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 5:49 pm
Location: On the edge of oblivion

Re: Tigers v Treviso Number 8's Crane or Robert Barbieri???

Post by jgriffin »

I'm mystified. Thought he looked slimmed down, more mobile, less 1/2 drop and a deft touch. Tigers tried to play inventively and he seemed to be in there OK. The penalty try was 100% him, as was Pearce's 33% him. :smt017
Leicester Tigers 1995-
Nottingham 1995-2000
Swansea (Whites) 1988-95
A game played on grass in the open air by teams of XV.
Hinckley Bob
Silver Member
Silver Member
Posts: 564
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2012 3:18 pm

Re: Tigers v Treviso Number 8's Crane or Robert Barbieri???

Post by Hinckley Bob »

He may no longer be our best 8 but he never gives anything less than 100%, is a good clubman and squad player and does not deserve being singled out for criticism.
G.K
Super User
Super User
Posts: 5787
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 10:19 am
Location: See SatNav

Re: Tigers v Treviso Number 8's Crane or Robert Barbieri???

Post by G.K »

I see no merit in getting on Crane's back at this point in time, especially after he has given many years of service to the club. Sure there are good and bad aspects to his game but that could be said of all players.
Nowadays referees decide matches, players by how much.
The Boy Dave
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1787
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 11:40 pm

Re: Tigers v Treviso Number 8's Crane or Robert Barbieri???

Post by The Boy Dave »

Terrible OP!
Crane possibly a little rusty but he is the type of player who plays better the harder the game is, big game type player.
Treviso weren't great and sometimes players can be lured into doing things away from their natural game and basics that they wouldn't normally do.
Also it was b!**)? cold.
Consider being in the way and looking out of place against Treviso might translate into being in the right place at the right time and doing the right things against a team like Sarries.
Cheery chappy
Gramps
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 129
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 7:58 am

Re: Tigers v Treviso Number 8's Crane or Robert Barbieri???

Post by Gramps »

Have to agree with the O P he was woeful last night. Don't doubt he gives 100% but surely he must have seen last night as a chance to get up the pecking order and just didn't take it
The Boy Dave
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1787
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 11:40 pm

Re: Tigers v Treviso Number 8's Crane or Robert Barbieri???

Post by The Boy Dave »

I disagree to a certain extent Gramps.
More to it than a one off match against a poor side.
Cheery chappy
Snorbins
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1818
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 3:16 pm
Location: St. Albans

Re: Tigers v Treviso Number 8's Crane or Robert Barbieri???

Post by Snorbins »

I thought he had a good game seeing as how he had been sidelined for so long. He did nothing others won't have done at 8; seems to me there's a group of disenfranchised voices here who just need a moan.
Post Reply