We would have qualified!

Forum to discuss everything that is Tigers related

Moderators: Tigerbeat, Rizzo, Tigers Press Office, Tigers Webmaster

Post Reply
MelChannerFan
Bronze Member
Bronze Member
Posts: 378
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 9:42 am
Location: Herts

We would have qualified!

Post by MelChannerFan »

If we had got the 5 pointer!!

Sarries got through on 17.

Wishful thinking.
Darc Tiger
Super User
Super User
Posts: 7304
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 3:53 pm

Re: We would have qualified!

Post by Darc Tiger »

We didn't deserve it anyway. Concentrate on getting in the Top 4.
rocktop51
Silver Member
Silver Member
Posts: 679
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:28 am
Location: Markfield

Re: We would have qualified!

Post by rocktop51 »

It wasn't Ulster that cost us qualification it was the abysmal performance against Scarlets away that did it
Hambo :- He was with England when he was injured, but he was a Tigers player, our player. He is still our player.”
Big Dai
Super User
Super User
Posts: 6054
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 6:04 pm
Location: Abergavenny

Re: We would have qualified!

Post by Big Dai »

rocktop51 wrote:It wasn't Ulster that cost us qualification it was the abysmal performance against Scarlets away that did it
One missed catch by Anthony Allen at Scarlets, after which he grinned like a Cheshire cat. Poor handling and interceptions thereafter. Then we failed to capitalise and get an bonus point at home against Ulster.

The cost was built on ineptitude.
Exile Wigstonite living in Wales.
Poet laureate of the "One Eyed Turk".
Bar stool philosopher in the "Wilted Daffodil"
amazing tiger
Bronze Member
Bronze Member
Posts: 434
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 10:51 pm

Re: We would have qualified!

Post by amazing tiger »

the scarlets game really messed things up for us we should of really won. but to be hounest i dont think we would of got to the semis so like we have said before lets just focus on the prem
jack
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1371
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 8:36 pm
Location: Walsall

Re: We would have qualified!

Post by jack »

No arguments from me about these posts :smt017
Tigers - true Champions!
MrPartridge
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1301
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2012 6:21 pm

Re: We would have qualified!

Post by MrPartridge »

Would have / could have / should have!

Frankly Ulster did us a favour. Our away record in Europe is appalling. Toulon or Clermont in the QF would have been our fate = same outcome as in 2013/4.
TigerintheCatStand
Top Cat
Top Cat
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2013 2:18 pm

Re: We would have qualified!

Post by TigerintheCatStand »

Not a single group point away from Welford Road in this season's european competition and only 18 match points in the 3 ties (only Treviso scored less on their travels).

I am a big Cockerill fan but my support is wearing thin.
Phil B
Super User
Super User
Posts: 2093
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2003 10:49 am
Location: St Julien Les Rosiers, Le Gard.

Re: We would have qualified!

Post by Phil B »

TigerintheCatStand wrote: I am a big Cockerill fan but my support is wearing thin.
I am a fan also. But, yes, it's getting harder by the game.
I could agree with you...but then we'd both be wrong.
Chobbsy
Super User
Super User
Posts: 3084
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 11:51 am
Location: Milton Keynes

Re: We would have qualified!

Post by Chobbsy »

Darc Tiger wrote:We didn't deserve it anyway. Concentrate on getting in the Top 4.

We didn't deserve it, it wasn't Ulster that did for us but that horrible day at the Scarlets
God created rugby so footballers have heros too
chipnchase
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1227
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 10:18 am
Location: Leicestershire, UK

Re: We would have qualified!

Post by chipnchase »

Very sad state of affairs. After the Scarlets game we blamed the poor performance on injuries yet with a substandard side we failed to beat an Ulster team playing for nothing but pride.

A larger majority of the team are international players yet looked lost and at times out of ideas.

So where has it gone wrong? Is it the coaching? is it the management of players? is it the players themselves?

We aren't producing the academy players we once did who would put their bodies on the line for the chance to wear the shirt, or are we just not giving them the chances?

We aren't attracting the best players in the world and instead are left giving contracts to 39 and 36 year olds who have seen better days which shows that the draw of the club no longer exists.

We have some of the best medical staff in the game which without we simply wouldn't have a squad to speak of. We have a great academy that has for years have produced international players and premiership regulars without fail. We have a huge stadium full of fanatical supporters who pay more than just their ticket price to show their support win, lose or draw. We have a fantastic commercial operation that has allowed the club to compete both on and off the field without the need for a single financer......

So what is the problem???
Phil B
Super User
Super User
Posts: 2093
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2003 10:49 am
Location: St Julien Les Rosiers, Le Gard.

Re: We would have qualified!

Post by Phil B »

Succinctly put. Hopefully the great minds that run the Club can get us back on track. We are not the first or only club with proud traditions and great records to fall on hard times, and we won't be the last.

I trust those in control will keep a clear head and not panic.
I could agree with you...but then we'd both be wrong.
chipnchase
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1227
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 10:18 am
Location: Leicestershire, UK

Re: We would have qualified!

Post by chipnchase »

I don't think anyone is panicking, just merely pointing out the obvious that 'the great minds' at the club seem to be ignoring.
Phil B
Super User
Super User
Posts: 2093
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2003 10:49 am
Location: St Julien Les Rosiers, Le Gard.

Re: We would have qualified!

Post by Phil B »

chipnchase wrote:I don't think anyone is panicking, just merely pointing out the obvious that 'the great minds' at the club seem to be ignoring.
I was referring to the powers that be, ie the "great minds" not anyone else.
I could agree with you...but then we'd both be wrong.
Post Reply