Tongue in Cheek?

OneEyedTiger · Post by **OneEyedTiger** » Wed Apr 02, 2014 5:04 pm

Or is that biting lip? Posted by Stains fans on their Facebook board.

http://offsidetackle.blogspot.co.uk/201 ... -help.html

Funny or just rude?

kpj tiger · Post by **kpj tiger** » Wed Apr 02, 2014 5:18 pm

Seems like a grade 1 "insert insult here", it could be argued it is wit if 90% of the articles were not about Tigers

Darc Tiger · Post by **Darc Tiger** » Wed Apr 02, 2014 5:20 pm

Spite poorly disguised as wit.

jack · Post by **jack** » Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:06 pm

Rather pitiful really.

Lets not forget this bloke was good enough to gain selection for the Lions very recently.

Sad attempt at humour.

WiggoTiger · Post by **WiggoTiger** » Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:24 pm

Lets face it our line out stats were much better than Saints and that was when Hartley was still on!! Sour grapes!!

Tyzot · Post by **Tyzot** » Wed Apr 02, 2014 9:32 pm

If you read some of the other articles on the site, they are similarly poor.

Read like a schoolchild's attempt at deep satirical humour.

Just not very intelligent throughout.

Best ignored.

SilebyTiger · Post by **SilebyTiger** » Wed Apr 02, 2014 9:38 pm

Bitter, sad people.

Smurphswillgetya · Post by **Smurphswillgetya** » Thu Apr 03, 2014 9:50 am

SilebyTiger wrote:Bitter, sad people.

It's a prerequisite to be a Saints supporter, you forgot to add jealous and twisted.

jgriffin · Post by **jgriffin** » Thu Apr 03, 2014 10:40 am

They will be so until they replace Mallinder and West for it is they, I believe , who are holding Stains back (so I'm cheering for them to have 20 year contracts

).
West in particular needs the counselling that Cockers has had re their bitter rivalry.

OneEyedTiger · Post by **OneEyedTiger** » Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:12 am

They're at it again; http://offsidetackle.blogspot.co.uk/201 ... nited.html

jack · Post by **jack** » Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:26 am

Best ignored. Not even witty. Possibly lessons in humour needed?

kornboy130 · Post by **kornboy130** » Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:49 am

Spends a lot of time watching and following Tigers in a desperate attempt to berate.

If we'd not beaten them in the past 10 attempts then maybe I'd be bitter too.

TigerAlex · Post by **TigerAlex** » Tue Apr 22, 2014 12:51 pm

OneEyedTiger wrote:They're at it again; http://offsidetackle.blogspot.co.uk/201 ... nited.html

Wait a minute. This was written by somebody who supports a team with Lee Dickson in it?

h's dad · Post by **h's dad** » Tue Apr 22, 2014 12:54 pm

I thought the second was much funnier than the first, if only on the basis that I didn't find the first funny at all.

Of course they're nearly all about Tigers. Tigers are the team that everybody is desperate to see taken down a peg or two because of their consistency and history. In this country neutrals favour the underdog and Tigers aren't (even when, very occasionally, they are). It's all a form of respect, or at least, jealousy.

h's dad · Post by **h's dad** » Tue Apr 22, 2014 12:57 pm

TigerAlex wrote:
OneEyedTiger wrote:They're at it again; http://offsidetackle.blogspot.co.uk/201 ... nited.html
Wait a minute. This was written by somebody who supports a team with Lee Dickson in it?

I may be a bit slow - how do you work that out?

Leicester Tigers

Tongue in Cheek?

Tongue in Cheek?

Re: Tongue in Cheek?

Re: Tongue in Cheek?

Re: Tongue in Cheek?

Re: Tongue in Cheek?

Re: Tongue in Cheek?

Re: Tongue in Cheek?

Re: Tongue in Cheek?

Re: Tongue in Cheek?

Re: Tongue in Cheek?

Re: Tongue in Cheek?

Re: Tongue in Cheek?

Re: Tongue in Cheek?

Re: Tongue in Cheek?

Re: Tongue in Cheek?