Forum to discuss everything that is Tigers related
Moderators: Rizzo, Tigerbeat, Tigers Press Office, Tigers Webmaster
-
BJ.
- Super User

- Posts: 5170
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 12:08 pm
- Location: One step ahead of the rest of the herd
Post
by BJ. » Fri Feb 28, 2014 6:04 am
From the BBC.
I appreciate every case has to be judged on its own merit but ...
Last edited by
BJ. on Fri Feb 28, 2014 10:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
Whatever you do, don't argue. We might never hear from you again.
-
tig1
- Gold Member

- Posts: 971
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 6:43 pm
- Location: nottingham
Post
by tig1 » Fri Feb 28, 2014 6:33 am
IMO this thread should be locked.
-
BJ.
- Super User

- Posts: 5170
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 12:08 pm
- Location: One step ahead of the rest of the herd
Post
by BJ. » Fri Feb 28, 2014 6:47 am
tig1 wrote:IMO this thread should be locked.
May I ask why?
Whatever you do, don't argue. We might never hear from you again.
-
sapajo
- Super User

- Posts: 4700
- Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 7:48 pm
Post
by sapajo » Fri Feb 28, 2014 8:08 am
tig1 wrote:IMO this thread should be locked.
Nice to see you believe in free speech

Without hope we are nothing, keep the faith, a Tiger for eternity
-
Pellsey
- Silver Member

- Posts: 534
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 3:41 pm
- Location: Luxembourg
Post
by Pellsey » Fri Feb 28, 2014 8:17 am
Haskell had his allowance suspended. Farrell didn't. Make of that as you will.
-
kornboy130
- Super User

- Posts: 4686
- Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 7:48 pm
- Location: Behind You
Post
by kornboy130 » Fri Feb 28, 2014 9:06 am
I think Haskell directly passed his on to a 3rd party auction (albeit for charity) and that's why they pinged him. Whilst that is absolutely and utterly ridiculous to do so to a man clearly helping a good cause - at least there is some consistency in that Farrell's ticket was sold on by someone he legitimately gave it to.
-
CitizenSmiff
- Gold Member

- Posts: 1255
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 2:53 am
Post
by CitizenSmiff » Fri Feb 28, 2014 9:31 am
Come on now we may not like his face, his dad, his ludicrously premature promotion or his Championship-standard game management but if having unreliable mates is a crime we'd all be doomed
-
Norfolk & Goode
- Silver Member

- Posts: 508
- Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 10:07 am
Post
by Norfolk & Goode » Fri Feb 28, 2014 9:44 am
BJ. wrote:May I ask why?
Because the RFU said "Farrell, 22, had no knowledge of the sale having passed on the ticket in good faith", and your title to the thread is implying otherwise.
Practice what you preach and show some integrity.
-
BJ.
- Super User

- Posts: 5170
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 12:08 pm
- Location: One step ahead of the rest of the herd
Post
by BJ. » Fri Feb 28, 2014 10:40 am
Norfolk & Goode wrote:Practice what you preach and show some integrity.
Unfortunately the system will not allow me to insert a winking emoticon into the header box. Therefore, I've amended the OP.
Whatever you do, don't argue. We might never hear from you again.
-
Johnnyg
- Senior Member

- Posts: 272
- Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 12:39 pm
Post
by Johnnyg » Fri Feb 28, 2014 12:20 pm
Would the winking emoticon be the forum equivalent of the "innocent face" tweet that cost Sally Bercow many thousands of pounds for her own defamatory statements?
-
Noddy555
- Super User

- Posts: 2823
- Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2013 9:32 pm
Post
by Noddy555 » Fri Feb 28, 2014 4:31 pm
If you believe what you read in today's daily mail if there was any wrongdoing it was by the coach Alex Sanderson and not Owen Farrell, that's if you believe what you read!
-
MrPartridge
- Gold Member

- Posts: 1299
- Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2012 6:21 pm
Post
by MrPartridge » Sat Mar 01, 2014 7:50 am
Complete non-story IMHO.
Some on here would get excitable if BBC published what OF had for breakfast!
-
Tomvarndell
- Bronze Member

- Posts: 376
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 9:36 pm
Post
by Tomvarndell » Sat Mar 01, 2014 8:42 am
I quite like the lad. He is a class act who unfortunately is more under rated by Tigers fans than he is over rated by the Rugby Media. For me he sits somewhere in between the two extremes and is certainly England's best bet at 10 at present. However, would be nice to see him playing 12 come the World Cup with a rejuvenated Freddie Burns at 10 and Manu at 13.

-
MrPartridge
- Gold Member

- Posts: 1299
- Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2012 6:21 pm
Post
by MrPartridge » Sat Mar 01, 2014 9:30 am
certainly England's best bet at 10 at present
+1
-
sapajo
- Super User

- Posts: 4700
- Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 7:48 pm
Post
by sapajo » Sat Mar 01, 2014 9:47 am
Tomvarndell wrote:I quite like the lad. He is a class act who unfortunately is more under rated by Tigers fans than he is over rated by the Rugby Media. For me he sits somewhere in between the two extremes and is certainly England's best bet at 10 at present. However, would be nice to see him playing 12 come the World Cup with a rejuvenated Freddie Burns at 10 and Manu at 13.

I doubt you will ever see Farrell starting at 12 for England he is not an international 12.
Without hope we are nothing, keep the faith, a Tiger for eternity