Interesting Tom Youngs rumour
Moderators: Tigerbeat, Rizzo, Tigers Press Office, Tigers Webmaster
Re: Interesting Tom Youngs rumour
Apologies guys I am totally wrong! TY did indeed start first 2 tests and Hibbard started the last.
Without hope we are nothing, keep the faith, a Tiger for eternity
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 1:52 pm
- Location: Lutterworth
Re: Interesting Tom Youngs rumour
[quote="MrPartridge"]Speaking to a few well informed rugby friends at the weekend with quite a good insight from their position working in and around AP and Championship clubs.
.......and these are ???????? Programme sellers ?? Bar staff ?? Stewards ??
.......and these are ???????? Programme sellers ?? Bar staff ?? Stewards ??
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 1301
- Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2012 6:21 pm
Re: Interesting Tom Youngs rumour
Just a bit higher up the pecking order than that ancientmariner, AV coach and a championship front row.and these are ???????? Programme sellers ?? Bar staff ?? Stewards ??
My comment wasn't meant in a negative sense - I like TY. But it interests me that he started as a centre and ended up at 2. His game has come on a lot and England and the Lions have confirmed that. My suspicion is Hartley will start on Saturday for England, but we will have to wait and see. Hope TY gets the nod.
Re: Interesting Tom Youngs rumour
I think OTY has a far better attitude and temperament than Desperate Dylan. He seems keen to learn and is not arrogant like Hartley. BTW, what has happened to Marler - injury?
Omnia dicta fortiora si dicta Latina
-
- Super User
- Posts: 5170
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 12:08 pm
- Location: One step ahead of the rest of the herd
Re: Interesting Tom Youngs rumour
IF this rumour is true, could someone please explain to me why we are advertising a weakness in the play of our first-choice hooker?
Whatever you do, don't argue. We might never hear from you again.
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 5:53 pm
- Location: London
Re: Interesting Tom Youngs rumour
I think that's the clearest evidence yet that the rumour is nonsense!BJ. wrote:IF this rumour is true, could someone please explain to me why we are advertising a weakness in the play of our first-choice hooker?