MurphysLaw wrote:
In France and England the Clubs are largely self-supporting and have a different relationship with their Unions. In what they see as a club competition, they want to have more say on how it is run.
Clubs in England and France seem to be relying on businessmen like Mr Wray and Mr Craig to support them.
And certainly Mr Wray has spoken of how he will run his business the way he sees fit, so Saracens seems to have a self-appointed club electorate of 1.
The situation appears to be similar in Bath, Racing Metro and Toulon and possibly more clubs.
MurphysLaw wrote:
I don't follow as to how giving more representation in this competition would make the leagues any less competitive.Both the Top 14 and the Aviva have become increasingly competitive under the stewardship of the clubs' bodies.
English soccer has been drowning in ever money since the early 90s and yet the only clubs that have been able to break the Man U/Arsenal stranglehold have been clubs that have been acquired by rich owners (Blackburn, Chelsea, Man City).
It's done nothing to promote a more competitive league.
Once upon a time a club like Burnley could win the league every now and again.
And could there ever be another success story like Ipswich or Nottingham Forest?
It's also done nothing for the financial health of clubs lower down the pyramid let alone the amateur game.
Similarly if rugby is run by rich men then however much money BT/Sky put into the game I'd imagine most of it will either be paid to the top players or worse go towards paying off debt piled onto the clubs by their owners.
I would prefer to see professional club rugby run on a system where a central body acts to keep the playing field level for all clubs while controlling the remuneration of players.
With the Unions in charge there is a chance of fair administration at a national level and a better chance of fairness in international competitions also. There view of rugby is, by definition, more holistic.
Otherwise, with the likes of Wray, Craig etc in charge, I think that we'll end up with bidding wars for players by success hungry club owners and debt funded club acquisitions by individuals who then burden the clubs with the cost of repayment.