Forum personality of the year.

[Phil B]

There's nothing wrong with the idea - as I mentioned before it was done a few years ago, but with some planning going into it (categories etc etc)and it was a success, I guess. Hopefully you people out there who won have still got your certificates, framed!! This attempt was poorly designed, and poorly executed, with little/no prior thought whatsoever.

[h's dad]

Thanks for making this poll happen Rizzo, along with everything else you do. A simple, first past the post poll that’s just a bit of fun as stated at the beginning that can surely give no reasonable person any grounds to whinge or complain.

[Phil B]

Thanks for making this poll happen Rizzo, along with everything else you do. A simple, first past the post poll that’s just a bit of fun as stated at the beginning that can surely give no reasonable person any grounds to whinge or complain.

You must be referring to my post, and what, with me being the most reasonable person (in my house), I am slightly offended!

My post was no whinge or complaint. Simply a comment that it was a good idea, and with more thought might have been a success, so encouraging it for next year, in a subtle sort of way. As it was, it was dropped because it had "served its purpose" (Rizzo), whatever that purpose was.

[jgriffin]

It was to differentiate between posters on the dimension of assumed self-importance.
Rizzo and I are now completing the MPhil thesis: "Assumed self-importance and the invisible poster - an attempt to quantify the elusive cranial-anal insertion metric." Leicester University Psychology Department unpublished MPhil dissertation 2013.

[Phil B]

It was to differentiate between posters on the dimension of assumed self-importance.
Rizzo and I are now completing the MPhil thesis: "Assumed self-importance and the invisible poster - an attempt to quantify the elusive cranial-anal insertion metric." Leicester University Psychology Department unpublished MPhil dissertation 2013.