TBP How long before....
Moderators: Tigerbeat, Rizzo, Tigers Press Office, Tigers Webmaster
TBP How long before....
They disapear?
After Tigers kept winning the league when first meant champions,
the RFU changed the system to allow others a chance to be champs with the playoffs.
Now Tigers have clocked up a record 6 successive TBP on the bounce how long before the system is changed again???
Personally I think Its a great system and does what it was meant to do and provide for entertaining attacking rugby ( saffas excepted)
After Tigers kept winning the league when first meant champions,
the RFU changed the system to allow others a chance to be champs with the playoffs.
Now Tigers have clocked up a record 6 successive TBP on the bounce how long before the system is changed again???
Personally I think Its a great system and does what it was meant to do and provide for entertaining attacking rugby ( saffas excepted)
-
- Super User
- Posts: 14868
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:23 pm
- Location: Essex
Re: TBP How long before....
My guess would be they will make it 5 tries for a tbp (or maybe a margin of 3 tries) and narrow the lbp to 5 points.TE wrote:They disapear?
After Tigers kept winning the league when first meant champions,
the RFU changed the system to allow others a chance to be champs with the playoffs.
Now Tigers have clocked up a record 6 successive TBP on the bounce how long before the system is changed again???
Personally I think Its a great system and does what it was meant to do and provide for entertaining attacking rugby ( saffas excepted)
Still keeping the faith!
Re: TBP How long before....
dont think they will do that, if they make the TBP too unobtainable then it will have a negative effect, and may as well not be there, how many teams score 5 trys? not that many really,
I dont think there's anything wrong with the LBP, one score in it is a close game and deserves reward.
I dont think there's anything wrong with the LBP, one score in it is a close game and deserves reward.
-
- Super User
- Posts: 14868
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:23 pm
- Location: Essex
Re: TBP How long before....
I agree. But Saffas (and Sequins) may not.TE wrote:dont think they will do that, if they make the TBP too unobtainable then it will have a negative effect, and may as well not be there, how many teams score 5 trys? not that many really,
I dont think there's anything wrong with the LBP, one score in it is a close game and deserves reward.
Still keeping the faith!
Re: TBP How long before....
I think the 6N is the only major tournament that doesn't operate the 4 try bonus point scoring system.*
It would be perverse to change the system in the Premiership and out of step with all other tournaments / leagues around the world so can't see it happening, myself.
*I am prepared to be corrected on that!
It would be perverse to change the system in the Premiership and out of step with all other tournaments / leagues around the world so can't see it happening, myself.
*I am prepared to be corrected on that!
Today is yesterday's tomorrow.
Re: TBP How long before....
Top 14 Try Bonus is for a margin of 3 tries - not simply scoring 4.Daveyboy wrote:I think the 6N is the only major tournament that doesn't operate the 4 try bonus point scoring system.*
It would be perverse to change the system in the Premiership and out of step with all other tournaments / leagues around the world so can't see it happening, myself.
*I am prepared to be corrected on that!
For when the One Great Scorer comes to write against your name,
He marks - not that you won or lost - but how you played the Game."
He marks - not that you won or lost - but how you played the Game."
-
- Super User
- Posts: 8343
- Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 8:46 pm
- Location: Scotland
Re: TBP How long before....
We could get Steven Fry to issue the bonus points like he does on QI,then we'd get loads of points just for turning up,looking mean.
Seriously,there's nothing wrong with the humour of the first post,but don't start giving the dafties that run the game ideas,there's nothing wrong with the game , so leave it alone.
Seriously,there's nothing wrong with the humour of the first post,but don't start giving the dafties that run the game ideas,there's nothing wrong with the game , so leave it alone.
"If you want entertainment, go to the theatre," says Edinburgh head coach Richard Cockerill. "Rugby players play the game to win.15/1/21.
Re: TBP How long before....
I've never been a fan of bonus points - you play to win.
For me bonus points should only count if sides are level on proper points.
County cricket seems devalued by bonus points - again they should only really count if a game is significantly shortened by rain so that a side which is genuinely doing better gets some reward for their efforts.
Coming back to rugby the try bonus point does skew things - purely because of the assumption that more tries means a better game.
Why shoulds a 9:6 win over Sarries (or any other top end of the table team) be only worth 4 points yet a 4 try 28:0 win over Newcastle or Wasps be worth 5?
For me bonus points should only count if sides are level on proper points.
County cricket seems devalued by bonus points - again they should only really count if a game is significantly shortened by rain so that a side which is genuinely doing better gets some reward for their efforts.
Coming back to rugby the try bonus point does skew things - purely because of the assumption that more tries means a better game.
Why shoulds a 9:6 win over Sarries (or any other top end of the table team) be only worth 4 points yet a 4 try 28:0 win over Newcastle or Wasps be worth 5?
-
- Tiger Cub
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 11:41 am
Re: TBP How long before....
mol2 wrote:I've never been a fan of bonus points - you play to win.
For me bonus points should only count if sides are level on proper points.
Coming back to rugby the try bonus point does skew things - purely because of the assumption that more tries means a better game.
Why shoulds a 9:6 win over Sarries (or any other top end of the table team) be only worth 4 points yet a 4 try 28:0 win over Newcastle or Wasps be worth 5?
Not sure I agree as a spectator, there is far more enjoyment in watching teams score trys. The exact same reason why a 5 point award for a try was changed from 3 to develop the current game into a format that was far more entertaining. I am not sure how interesting the league would be without them? We'd be trailing 8 points behind quins and 3rd in the table...
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 5:53 pm
- Location: London
Re: TBP How long before....
I think it's previously been established that bonus points have little impact on final league standings (e.g. we'd be 3rd now, not 2nd - I think our form is more important than league position going into the semi-final).
Where they do have an impact, and where they have improved rugby as a spectacle, is in the last 15 minutes of a game that has already been won - the losing team might have a losing bonus to play for and the winning team might have a try bonus to play for.
Where they do have an impact, and where they have improved rugby as a spectacle, is in the last 15 minutes of a game that has already been won - the losing team might have a losing bonus to play for and the winning team might have a try bonus to play for.
Re: TBP How long before....
Couldn't agree more - a more radical idea may be to let sides score a tbp for every try they score over 3. ie 4 = 1pt 5 = 2pts etc and certainly the 6N should follow suitTE wrote:They disapear?
After Tigers kept winning the league when first meant champions,
the RFU changed the system to allow others a chance to be champs with the playoffs.
Now Tigers have clocked up a record 6 successive TBP on the bounce how long before the system is changed again???
Personally I think Its a great system and does what it was meant to do and provide for entertaining attacking rugby ( saffas excepted)
Hehehehehehehehe
Re: TBP How long before....
Tongue in cheek.
A team who does not score a try gets one third of the points if the opposing side loses & scores a try. Meaning that a team who wins a game on penalty/drop kicks only does not necessarily get winning points.
As stated tongue in cheek.
A team who does not score a try gets one third of the points if the opposing side loses & scores a try. Meaning that a team who wins a game on penalty/drop kicks only does not necessarily get winning points.
As stated tongue in cheek.
-
- Bronze Member
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:44 am
- Location: Out in the sticks
Re: TBP How long before....
Sorry mol2 but to say bonus points has devalued cricket is total garbage. Do you or have you ever played the game? Cricket is a different game that lasts for 4 days. The weather can play a lot towards a game and the accumulation of bonus points goes a long way to the final league positions. If you just had a couple of points or whatever for a win and a draw, you wouldn't get anywheremol2 wrote:
County cricket seems devalued by bonus points - again they should only really count if a game is significantly shortened by rain so that a side which is genuinely doing better gets some reward for their efforts.
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 1782
- Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 2:55 pm
- Location: Birmingham / Bangor Uni
Re: TBP How long before....
bonus points have devalued cricket - they're all staggered to the first innings' performance which means it gives another bonus to the team winning the toss as they will be either batting or bowling in what is perceived to be the better conditions for the activityNailsworthstiger wrote:Sorry mol2 but to say bonus points has devalued cricket is total garbage. Do you or have you ever played the game? Cricket is a different game that lasts for 4 days. The weather can play a lot towards a game and the accumulation of bonus points goes a long way to the final league positions. If you just had a couple of points or whatever for a win and a draw, you wouldn't get anywheremol2 wrote:
County cricket seems devalued by bonus points - again they should only really count if a game is significantly shortened by rain so that a side which is genuinely doing better gets some reward for their efforts.
rather than bowling bonus being decided in the first 100 overs it should be the first 50 overs of each innings, or the first 100 of the better innings