> Murphy being the hero doesn't make Flood the villain
Moderators: Tigerbeat, Rizzo, Tigers Press Office, Tigers Webmaster
-
- New Member
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 1:18 pm
> Murphy being the hero doesn't make Flood the villain
Hello Forum,
Here is the link to the latest article on From The Crumbie Terrace about Leicester's 20-19 win over Saracens and the furore surrounding Toby Flood...
http://crumbieterrace.blogspot.com/
Thanks for reading!
Here is the link to the latest article on From The Crumbie Terrace about Leicester's 20-19 win over Saracens and the furore surrounding Toby Flood...
http://crumbieterrace.blogspot.com/
Thanks for reading!
Re: > Murphy being the hero doesn't make Flood the villain
Murphy and Flood are pure class.
-
- Bronze Member
- Posts: 469
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 12:19 am
- Location: The diaspora - West Norfolk
Re: > Murphy being the hero doesn't make Flood the villain
Murphy being the hero doesn't make Flood the villain.
Agreed.
Agreed.
ST in new Clubhouse stand ... sadly, my back's no longer up to standing :-(
-
- Silver Member
- Posts: 510
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 8:23 pm
Re: > Murphy being the hero doesn't make Flood the villain
Isambard
Murphy is pure class..
Flood----not in the same League, never has been, never will be..
Get real !!
Murphy is pure class..
Flood----not in the same League, never has been, never will be..
Get real !!
Re: > Murphy being the hero doesn't make Flood the villain
Interesting and thoughtful post, Luke.
Flood is one of the best 10s in the Prem, and some indifferent performances don't make him the worst, particularly when returning from injury.
Smurf had a dreadful season in 10/11 and was being regarded as a "has-been". He was badly out of form, and thank goodness Bubbles was in form. He, of course is now out of form. All three are quality internationals, and all 3 will be remembered as such.
Flood is one of the best 10s in the Prem, and some indifferent performances don't make him the worst, particularly when returning from injury.
Smurf had a dreadful season in 10/11 and was being regarded as a "has-been". He was badly out of form, and thank goodness Bubbles was in form. He, of course is now out of form. All three are quality internationals, and all 3 will be remembered as such.
Valhalla I am coming!
-
- Super User
- Posts: 14868
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:23 pm
- Location: Essex
Re: > Murphy being the hero doesn't make Flood the villain
Just so!!fleabane wrote:Interesting and thoughtful post, Luke.
Flood is one of the best 10s in the Prem, and some indifferent performances don't make him the worst, particularly when returning from injury.
Smurf had a dreadful season in 10/11 and was being regarded as a "has-been". He was badly out of form, and thank goodness Bubbles was in form. He, of course is now out of form. All three are quality internationals, and all 3 will be remembered as such.
Still keeping the faith!
Re: > Murphy being the hero doesn't make Flood the villain
Sorry, but I disagree. Geordan's career puts him not just in a different league but in a different stratosphere. That is no disrespect to the other two, but testimony to over a decade of superlative play.
-
- Super User
- Posts: 14868
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:23 pm
- Location: Essex
Re: > Murphy being the hero doesn't make Flood the villain
I take your point.Granby wrote:Sorry, but I disagree. Geordan's career puts him not just in a different league but in a different stratosphere. That is no disrespect to the other two, but testimony to over a decade of superlative play.
Bubbles and Floody still have much of their careeres in front of them whereas, alas, Geordnas is drawing to a close.
He is indeed a legend!
Still keeping the faith!
Re: > Murphy being the hero doesn't make Flood the villain
Flood went AWOL when a drop was clearly there for the taking. For an international fly half playing in a club match that is very worrying. If he isn't confident at club level he can't expect to have a top level role for England with a key element of a fly half's skill missing.
Villain no but a big concern without a doubt.
Villain no but a big concern without a doubt.
Re: > Murphy being the hero doesn't make Flood the villain
Maybe he's younger than I think but I thought Bubbles was at the tail end of his career as well?Bill W (2) wrote: Bubbles and Floody still have much of their careeres in front of them whereas,
Re: > Murphy being the hero doesn't make Flood the villain
According to his players blog he will be but a youthful 32 in March so he is not exactly a spring chickenStupid wrote:Maybe he's younger than I think but I thought Bubbles was at the tail end of his career as well?Bill W (2) wrote: Bubbles and Floody still have much of their careeres in front of them whereas,
Without hope we are nothing, keep the faith, a Tiger for eternity
Re: > Murphy being the hero doesn't make Flood the villain
This isn't the first time Flood has appeared to shy away from taking control of a situation. Last year's prem final anyone?
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 1166
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: Coalville
Re: > Murphy being the hero doesn't make Flood the villain
Really not understanding the Flood bashing with regards to the drop goal.
He isn't very good at them, as he's proved on numerous occasions, but stood in the pocket seemingly willing to have a go. Was clearly going to get charged down when the ball did come to him, so he took it into contact instead. So sensible so far. Smurf, who I remember dropping one from just inside his own half (I believe) against Gloucester then stepped into position and took control. Really not seeing the problem here.
By the same logic, if Flood had attempted the drop goal, would people now be saying Smurf bottled it because he didn't step up as an experienced player and captian who has the drop goal in his book of tricks? No of course they wouldn't. I've seen a certain Dan Carter decline to drop a goal in the World Cup, but he's not a bad player because of it.
He isn't very good at them, as he's proved on numerous occasions, but stood in the pocket seemingly willing to have a go. Was clearly going to get charged down when the ball did come to him, so he took it into contact instead. So sensible so far. Smurf, who I remember dropping one from just inside his own half (I believe) against Gloucester then stepped into position and took control. Really not seeing the problem here.
By the same logic, if Flood had attempted the drop goal, would people now be saying Smurf bottled it because he didn't step up as an experienced player and captian who has the drop goal in his book of tricks? No of course they wouldn't. I've seen a certain Dan Carter decline to drop a goal in the World Cup, but he's not a bad player because of it.
It's only cheating if you get caught.
-
- Super User
- Posts: 14868
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:23 pm
- Location: Essex
Re: > Murphy being the hero doesn't make Flood the villain
fleabane wrote:Sensible 'Squid.
Concur!
Still keeping the faith!