Players boycott RFU WC reviews

[fleabane]

http://tinyurl.com/6bv5x9y

Oh well!

[Kinoulton]

This is the old f*rts being very amateurish again.

They couldn't manage a sweety shop.

You NEVER undermine a manager. Yes, you can question him, criticise him (if you have the cojones), explain your expectations and ask what he sees as the successes to build on and the failures to deal with.

Then you justify your position if you can by listening and reacting.

To tunnel beneath him and speak directly to his players is the ultimate cowardice and requires no managerial skill at all. Which is what they possess.

[trendylfj]

I suppose that these "reviews" give Rob Andrew something to do - otherwise what would he do??? - Oh I forgot - Who is reviewing Rob Andrews performance??? - Maybe there is no-one else left as they are all doing reviews elsewhere.

The whole thing stinks and I am so glad the players, or at least some of them, are refusing to take part.

Having said all that, I don't think they are going to stop until they force Johno out and replace him with CW. Thats what they are after, it was what they were after 12 months ago, and they won't stop until it happens.

THEY ARE A LOAD OF T***ERS

[Isambard]

When did Rob Andrew last perform? I think we should be told.

[biffer]

So, let me get this straight. The players LIKE the coach who lets them go out and party, but only gets them to the quarter finals. They DON'T like the guy who was a bit more disciplinarian and got them to the final. Hmmmmm.

[WiggoTiger]

Correct!! But CW been out the game too long and will be 'old hat' and England need to progress and move on not regress and stick with 'older players'.

[tonyw]

They were never likely to win the world cup when they treated it like an end of season **** up, not professional enough both from players and management!