Why did we let Amorasino go?

Forum to discuss everything that is Tigers related

Moderators: Tigerbeat, Rizzo, Tigers Press Office, Tigers Webmaster

MelChannerFan
Bronze Member
Bronze Member
Posts: 378
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 9:42 am
Location: Herts

Why did we let Amorasino go?

Post by MelChannerFan »

He was brilliant against the Argies.
BJ.
Super User
Super User
Posts: 5170
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 12:08 pm
Location: One step ahead of the rest of the herd

Re: Why did we let Amorasino go?

Post by BJ. »

MelChannerFan wrote:He was brilliant against the Argies.
Really? Who was he playing for?
Whatever you do, don't argue. We might never hear from you again.
mike
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1134
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 9:12 am
Location: norwich

Re: Why did we let Amorasino go?

Post by mike »

To answer the question - too much flair , too much pace and a reluctance to buy in to our boring style of play . Also a bit injury prone and sometimes a bit flaky under the high ball .
TigerAlex
Silver Member
Silver Member
Posts: 628
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 9:20 pm

Re: Why did we let Amorasino go?

Post by TigerAlex »

mike wrote:To answer the question - too much flair , too much pace and a reluctance to buy in to our boring style of play . Also a bit injury prone and sometimes a bit flaky under the high ball .
Would this be the boring style of play that made Tigers end last season with more tries and the most try bonus points than any other team in the Premiership?
Richard
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1286
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2003 11:07 am
Location: Where Am I.....?

Re: Why did we let Amorasino go?

Post by Richard »

No one could spell his name....
the future is bright
the future is
Scarlet Green and White
Purebob
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1903
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 5:53 pm
Location: Dudley

Re: Why did we let Amorasino go?

Post by Purebob »

I hear its cos Speedy wanted more first team berths. He came on leaps and bounds IMO, and could have been stunning for us, but as a Pumas international he wanted to play more first team rugby. Its fair enough I think.

He was really splendid in last season's A competition.
norfolkexpat
Silver Member
Silver Member
Posts: 510
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 8:23 pm

Re: Why did we let Amorasino go?

Post by norfolkexpat »

Sometimes, nothing seems to make any sense at Tigers--
I mean, selling Amorosino when we have Hurrell Robinson and Smith on board ???
Let us hope that the rumours about AAC arriving from the Aussies is true....
WhitecapTiger
Super User
Super User
Posts: 6045
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 1:23 am
Location: Roaming

Re: Why did we let Amorasino go?

Post by WhitecapTiger »

norfolkexpat wrote:Let us hope that the rumours about AAC arriving from the Aussies is true....
Whilst I would welcome him signing for us, I thought this 'rumour' had died a death some time ago? IIRC he extended his deal with the ARU for another 2 years earlier this year, staying at the Brumbies. Could be wrong and things may have changed.
Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens.
biffer
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1597
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2011 4:35 pm

Re: Why did we let Amorasino go?

Post by biffer »

WhitecapTiger wrote:
norfolkexpat wrote:Let us hope that the rumours about AAC arriving from the Aussies is true....
Whilst I would welcome him signing for us, I thought this 'rumour' had died a death some time ago? IIRC he extended his deal with the ARU for another 2 years earlier this year, staying at the Brumbies. Could be wrong and things may have changed.
He's no longer listed as a member of the Brumbies squad on their website

http://www.brumbies.com.au/Team/BrumbiesSquad.aspx

Edit - he's signed for the 'tahs

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... 6030015102
WhitecapTiger
Super User
Super User
Posts: 6045
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 1:23 am
Location: Roaming

Re: Why did we let Amorasino go?

Post by WhitecapTiger »

biffer wrote:
WhitecapTiger wrote:
norfolkexpat wrote:Let us hope that the rumours about AAC arriving from the Aussies is true....
Whilst I would welcome him signing for us, I thought this 'rumour' had died a death some time ago? IIRC he extended his deal with the ARU for another 2 years earlier this year, staying at the Brumbies. Could be wrong and things may have changed.
He's no longer listed as a member of the Brumbies squad on their website

http://www.brumbies.com.au/Team/BrumbiesSquad.aspx

Edit - he's signed for the 'tahs

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... 6030015102
Only half wrong then :smt002 Cheers :smt023
Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens.
DickyP
Super User
Super User
Posts: 2815
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:14 pm
Location: Newark

Re: Why did we let Amorasino go?

Post by DickyP »

mike wrote:To answer the question - too much flair , too much pace and a reluctance to buy in to our boring style of play . Also a bit injury prone and sometimes a bit flaky under the high ball .
You missed out the other two problems - too small and weak tackler. I did like his rather bizarre running style though.
For when the One Great Scorer comes to write against your name,
He marks - not that you won or lost - but how you played the Game."
Hot_Charlie
Super User
Super User
Posts: 4059
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 9:30 pm
Location: Lincoln

Re: Why did we let Amorasino go?

Post by Hot_Charlie »

DickyP wrote: You missed out the other two problems - too small and weak tackler. I did like his rather bizarre running style though.
The club did miss a sitter in not producing "Churchill" dog style nodding Amorosinos...
Nik
Super User
Super User
Posts: 4501
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 5:59 pm
Location: Wiltshire

Re: Why did we let Amorasino go?

Post by Nik »

I spoke to Lucas and he said he needed more first team match time, which is fair enough.
Life was like a box of chocolates - until I ate them! :smt061
Stu_F
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1896
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 9:01 pm
Location: Enderby

Re: Why did we let Amorasino go?

Post by Stu_F »

Err, Lucas is at the World Cup so had he stayed we would have been even more depleted.

We've got Mathew Tait in his place haven't we?

& there's still Lee Robinson, at least he's fit!
Post Reply