The Scrum

Forum to discuss everything that is Tigers related

Moderators: Tigerbeat, Rizzo, Tigers Press Office, Tigers Webmaster

Bill W (2)
Super User
Super User
Posts: 14868
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: Essex

The Scrum

Post by Bill W (2) »

England v Australia - ref Joubert (SA). No scrum completed; all resulted in free kicks or penalties.

Scotland v New Zealand - ref D. Pearson (England). Scrums constantly reset to achieve competion.

Is this a difference in "interpretation"?
Still keeping the faith!
Darc Tiger
Super User
Super User
Posts: 7310
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 3:53 pm

Re: The Scrum

Post by Darc Tiger »

That, or the Aussies ducked every scrum.
tigerbruiser
Tiger Cub
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 6:46 am
Location: The Winnersh Triangle where people disappear

Re: The Scrum

Post by tigerbruiser »

In that case there is no point in picking props against the Aussies. Why not pick six back rows and just lean on them?

It was like watching 15 man RL at times.
Yorkshire man
Top Cat
Top Cat
Posts: 94
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:02 am

Re: The Scrum

Post by Yorkshire man »

That is taking it a bit far, to criticise one of the best games of rugby I have seen in a long time, never mind the quality England performance, just because there were only four scrums in the whole game. As scrums generally speaking come from errors, perhaps it was the least error strewn game any of us have ever watched. Don't get me wrong as an ex forward myself, I appreciate the value of the scrum, but dont be critical of a shortage.

You mighy comment next that it was an ex RL player who scored both Englands tries.
fleabane
Super User
Super User
Posts: 5178
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 4:26 pm
Location: Occitanie

Re: The Scrum

Post by fleabane »

Wales vs SA had a number of resets by Steve Walsh, who gave the impression he knew what was going on. Moore (BBC) complained it took 2 minutes on one occasion to get it right, although the ground underfoot was causing as much problem as the frtont rows.

You can't win!
Valhalla I am coming!
Big Dai
Super User
Super User
Posts: 6062
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 6:04 pm
Location: Abergavenny

Re: The Scrum

Post by Big Dai »

Yes you can!

Ban the hit and come together like the good old days!
Exile Wigstonite living in Wales.
Poet laureate of the "One Eyed Turk".
Bar stool philosopher in the "Wilted Daffodil"
Bill W (2)
Super User
Super User
Posts: 14868
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: Essex

Re: The Scrum

Post by Bill W (2) »

Big Dai wrote:Yes you can!

Ban the hit and come together like the good old days!
Ah yes! I remember them well!

:smt023 :smt023 :smt023
Still keeping the faith!
tigerburnie
Super User
Super User
Posts: 8345
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 8:46 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: The Scrum

Post by tigerburnie »

Brian Moore said yesterday(I know he says it every week and in his sleep as well probably)but the put in to the scrum is never straight.
Remember the days when we all got excited when there was a heel against the head,can't recall the last time that happened.
The scrum is fine,it's the inability of the officials to enforce the required laws.Proper binding and a straight feed and you have it..........rugby union.
"If you want entertainment, go to the theatre," says Edinburgh head coach Richard Cockerill. "Rugby players play the game to win.15/1/21.
Bill W (2)
Super User
Super User
Posts: 14868
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: Essex

Re: The Scrum

Post by Bill W (2) »

tigerburnie wrote:Remember the days when we all got excited when there was a heel against the head,can't recall the last time that happened.
.
You do get heels against the head - but nowadays they occur because the (defending) pack win the hit and push the side with the put in off the ball.

They used to occur because of sneaky work by the hooker and tight head. The absence of this today is marked by the lack of "foot up" penalties. There is no need for either hooker to strike because the ball is fed into the second row.
Still keeping the faith!
Kinoulton
Super User
Super User
Posts: 11357
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:13 pm
Location: East Riding

Re: The Scrum

Post by Kinoulton »

Anyone else notice that everyone's favourite man Stuart Barnes made it into Private Eye's Pseuds Corner for his comment: "It's so hard, isn't it, this 'crouch, touch, pause, engage'? It's like a philosophical debate about the nature of time."

To be fair, I think he's been harshly ridiculed, as he was probably being ironic, and they also spelt his forname as 'Stewart'.
Kicks and scrums and ruck and roll.....Is all my brain and body need!
Bill W (2)
Super User
Super User
Posts: 14868
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: Essex

Re: The Scrum

Post by Bill W (2) »

Kinoulton wrote:Anyone else notice that everyone's favourite man Stuart Barnes made it into Private Eye's Pseuds Corner for his comment: "It's so hard, isn't it, this 'crouch, touch, pause, engage'? It's like a philosophical debate about the nature of time."

To be fair, I think he's been harshly ridiculed, as he was probably being ironic, and they also spelt his forname as 'Stewart'.
No ridiculing of the rotund one is harsh!!!
Still keeping the faith!
Big Dai
Super User
Super User
Posts: 6062
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 6:04 pm
Location: Abergavenny

Re: The Scrum

Post by Big Dai »

I've been speaking with John Perkins (Pontypool and Wales) over a pint of Felin Foel Double Dragon on this one! He agrees. Ban the hit and bring back the penalty for charging.

I can't put all the things he said about skullduggery down on here! But my sides ache from laughing!

Good on ya Perky!
Exile Wigstonite living in Wales.
Poet laureate of the "One Eyed Turk".
Bar stool philosopher in the "Wilted Daffodil"
Snorbins
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1818
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 3:16 pm
Location: St. Albans

Re: The Scrum

Post by Snorbins »

isnt the problem the commands and the last one to engage? the refs decide the time beteeen touch and engage.
Bill W (2)
Super User
Super User
Posts: 14868
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: Essex

Re: The Scrum

Post by Bill W (2) »

Snorbins wrote:isnt the problem the commands and the last one to engage? the refs decide the time beteeen touch and engage.
I think not. Crouch, touch, pause, engage even granted different lengths of pauses between pause and engage is not the problem. The problem is that at engage you are allowed to "hit". In days of old you folded neatly together and were not allowed to "hit" until the ball was put in.
Still keeping the faith!
Post Reply