TV Coverage - ESPN

Forum to discuss everything that is Tigers related

Moderators: Tigerbeat, Rizzo, Tigers Press Office, Tigers Webmaster

No. 3
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 12:07 pm
Location: Leicester

TV Coverage - ESPN

Post by No. 3 »

It seems that Sky have been out bid to an extent by ESPN...

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/broadcastin ... ights.html

This would seems to show Sky with 26 live matches a season plus one semi final, and ESPN with 43 live matches, one of the semi finals plus the final. With them already having Top 14 it looks like another expense from next season! :smt009

Still - it may mean less Stuart Barnes :smt001
Purebob
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1903
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 5:53 pm
Location: Dudley

Re: TV Coverage - ESPN

Post by Purebob »

Less Barnes is almost worth pay-per-view TV I think.
Rykard
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1438
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 4:05 pm

Re: TV Coverage - ESPN

Post by Rykard »

Well it may mean more bums on seats for tigers as we won't be subscribing to espn.. we already have sky sports and can't justify more for espn.
cheers
Rich
FlyingTiger
Silver Member
Silver Member
Posts: 599
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 2:13 pm

Re: TV Coverage - ESPN

Post by FlyingTiger »

Great news I can bin my sky sports and get back to my Friday night rugby. If ESPN are going to show 43 games wunderbar!! Only downside is Nigel Stamming-Smith? Maybe he will be full of french plonk anyway and provide the caberet
The severity of the itch is inversely proportional to the reach
kricher192
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 208
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 7:33 pm
Location: Rotherham

Re: TV Coverage - ESPN

Post by kricher192 »

Hate to tell everyone...
If you have ever seen an NFL game live then that is the picture quality you can expect from espn... If you haven't seen any form of American sport recently, you will not know what i am describing...

Basically american sports provider espn have not changed their cameras in at least a decade, so when they bought rights to show British football, they just sent their old cameras to England.

More importantly what I'm saying is that picture quality is rubbish compared to sky sports :smt023
Forwards win games , Backs decide by how much
g
Super User
Super User
Posts: 5340
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 6:14 pm
Location: Chesterfield

Re: TV Coverage - ESPN

Post by g »

Well I certainly won't be paying any more money to sky. Who gets the HC Final, Espn or sky?


We only subscribed to sky sports this year for the Lions tour and the Guiness Prem matches if we are getting less matches through Sky Sports then we will unsubscribe as basically we only had sky sports for the rugby.

I cannot see many people paying ESPN to watch rugby so if it didn't work for Setanta how will it work for ESPN.
Last edited by g on Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Purebob
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1903
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 5:53 pm
Location: Dudley

Re: TV Coverage - ESPN

Post by Purebob »

I get ESPN with my Virgin cable package. They have an HD channel for live events such as UFC and french top 14 rugby and the quality is quite excellent.
JWM
Bronze Member
Bronze Member
Posts: 469
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 12:19 am
Location: The diaspora - West Norfolk

Re: TV Coverage - ESPN

Post by JWM »

Good news!

I'm blowed if I'm spending the best part of £40 p/month for Sky - most of which I don't want, thankyou - (plus the commitment of a contract) to get the necessary Sky Sports 1,2 and 3 for the mere 26 GP matches a season.

ESPN £10 a month (and no minimum contract) for 43 matches, s/f and final. Have it for the season, don't have it for the close season. And apparently acceptable picture quality.

Seems great to me!
ST in new Clubhouse stand ... sadly, my back's no longer up to standing :-(
Richard
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1286
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2003 11:07 am
Location: Where Am I.....?

Re: TV Coverage - ESPN

Post by Richard »

Will they still be showing the french top 14 as well
the future is bright
the future is
Scarlet Green and White
g
Super User
Super User
Posts: 5340
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 6:14 pm
Location: Chesterfield

Re: TV Coverage - ESPN

Post by g »

Richard

Are you saying then that you don't have to have the sky sports package to subscribe to ESPN? I thought you could only subscribe to ESPN if you had the full Sky sports package.

So if we cancel our sky sports package at the end of it's contract and go for the basic cheapest sky package then we can subscribe to ESPN at a cost of £10?

If thats the case I will gladly spend £10 a month for ESPN. I thought I would have to keep paying £40 + a month to sky sports and then pay again on top to get ESPN.
sunbeamer
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 127
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 8:44 am
Location: Somerset

Re: TV Coverage - ESPN

Post by sunbeamer »

am also interested to know whether we can take ESPN without Sky

but the trouble with ditching Sky Sports is that we would also lose the cricket!!!

:smt045
me2
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 987
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 2:51 pm
Location: Essex

Re: TV Coverage - ESPN

Post by me2 »

g, ESPN will only be showing the Premiership.

Sky have still retained the rights for some of the GP & all of the Heineken Cup so if you want to watch Tigers' European games on TV you won't be able to get rid of your Sky Sports.




ESPN have bought the rights to 43 GP games including 1 Semi & the final.

Sky will have the rights to 26 GP games including the other Semi (but no live coverage of the final) as well as the rights to the Heineken Cup pool & knockout stages and the AW Cup.
sunbeamer
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 127
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 8:44 am
Location: Somerset

Re: TV Coverage - ESPN

Post by sunbeamer »

not an ideal split is it?
Richard
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1286
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2003 11:07 am
Location: Where Am I.....?

Re: TV Coverage - ESPN

Post by Richard »

At least it will be available to watch on freeview
the future is bright
the future is
Scarlet Green and White
bluntiger
Super User
Super User
Posts: 2649
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:58 pm
Location: Huntingdon

Re: TV Coverage - ESPN

Post by bluntiger »

g wrote:....... I thought I would have to keep paying £40 + a month to sky sports and then pay again on top to get ESPN.
Now you're getting the idea g!!
Always a Tiger
Post Reply