It did look bad when he went off, but I would hope that if there was any doubt about his fitness he wouldn't have been out on the lap of the pitch applauding the fans at the end.
.......could be without Hazza. I'll admit it looked pretty grim. But we could also be without Julian after stamping on El Abd. (Who, just for the record, got what he desrved!) :o(
Exile Wigstonite living in Wales.
Poet laureate of the "One Eyed Turk".
Bar stool philosopher in the "Wilted Daffodil"
I thought Frank Murphy did well when he came on and has played well throughout the season. Harry is obviously first choice but Frank wouldn't let us down for sure.
Harry is obviously first choice but Frank wouldn't let us down for sure.
Well, yeah. Murphy would probably be, what, adequate?
But Harry is a very special player. He lifts Tigers several notches the way he plays.
And he occupies teams' defensive nightmares. If you defend Tigers with Harry, you have to account for him in a way you don't have to account for other 9s. Take him away and Tigers become maybe 8-10% easier to defend.
Plus, Harry is a wonderful defensive player. Gloucester will be running out their own star #9, and I would much rather have Harry dealing with Peter Richards.
If Harry is not fit, we are noticeably easier to beat.
I personally think that he is the worst player that could have got injured for us. He is so important and we will suffer without him. Can't believe it :-(
The early bird may catch the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.