And the winner of the middlesex 7's is....................
Moderators: Tigerbeat, Rizzo, Tigers Press Office, Tigers Webmaster
And the winner of the middlesex 7's is....................
Josh Lewsey! No seriously awsome today almost everytime he carried the ball he scored a try he wracked up about 15 tries in the end, congrats wasps and unlucky Tigers, however my one complaint for today was Beamand, you may not have picked it up if you watched it on TV but why on earth wasn't he dtopped , Humphries looks good guys!
-
- Super User
- Posts: 7106
- Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 8:40 pm
- Location: NW Leics
-
- Super User
- Posts: 7106
- Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 8:40 pm
- Location: NW Leics
Yes I was there. Very pleased to hear that Croft got the praise he deserved from the commentary team. It was thoroughly deserved. Won a hell of a lot of restart ball that he had no right to get to, and proved to be very agile, aware and pacy in the loose whilst really putting himself around in defence. I was very impressed.
-
- Super User
- Posts: 7106
- Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 8:40 pm
- Location: NW Leics
-
- Silver Member
- Posts: 525
- Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 1:49 pm
- Location: leicester
Tom Croft is a huge asset, now and for the future, bringing pace and agility that looks awesome. He must be very unlucky to have missed out on the England squads, but that can only mean the better players ahead of him must be true giants of the game.
Get behind the young players and help them develop to their full potential. For sure, don't rubbish them if they have an off game.
Get behind the young players and help them develop to their full potential. For sure, don't rubbish them if they have an off game.
If Tigers become Lions, how do Lions become Pussycats?
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 1787
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 2:20 pm
- Location: Bodmin
Sorry if this is mentioned on another thread, but what was going on at the start of the final. Tigers were warming up and Wasps were on the pitch pointing at their watch and saying the game should be starting. It seemed to put Tigers on the back foot as they had to rush in and get changed. As the play kicked off, Henry wasn't quite on the field.
What did the commentary say? Was it Tigers fault, or poor organisation? I think it certainly put them on the back foot, which meant Wasps raced ahead at the start. I'm sure the commentary may have said Tigers were making Wasps wait, but it didn't seem like that to me.
What did the commentary say? Was it Tigers fault, or poor organisation? I think it certainly put them on the back foot, which meant Wasps raced ahead at the start. I'm sure the commentary may have said Tigers were making Wasps wait, but it didn't seem like that to me.
-
- Super User
- Posts: 7106
- Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 8:40 pm
- Location: NW Leics
Hi CT
The commentators seemed a bit bemused, and as pointed out on another thread SKY were running behind schedule and ended up with a shortened final.
The gist of it was that if anyone was at fault, it was probably Tigers. But, to be fair, the commentary didn't make too much of it.
Lewsey seemed pretty hacked off .... not a man to give extra incentive to, IMO !
The commentators seemed a bit bemused, and as pointed out on another thread SKY were running behind schedule and ended up with a shortened final.
The gist of it was that if anyone was at fault, it was probably Tigers. But, to be fair, the commentary didn't make too much of it.
Lewsey seemed pretty hacked off .... not a man to give extra incentive to, IMO !
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 1787
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 2:20 pm
- Location: Bodmin